Cousin_Martha_Corey on Nostr: Would a “real feminist site” be one that regulated content in some way, so that ...

Would a “real feminist site” be one that regulated content in some way, so that heterodox or “normie” women were not present or less visible? I suppose the alternative would be to have groups or discussion areas, I believe like Ovarit does, so that those who wanted to discuss only strictly feminist issues wouldn’t have to sift through other content.

I think it’s interesting that apparently what is emerging is that many people do want a restricted discussion group of some kind. All this time, pro-trans “feminists” (of which there are many) could have come here, engaged about areas of shared interests, and tried to debate on the issue of trans, but of course, they didn’t. Now, I see that even radical feminists would prefer not to have to scroll through non-radfem content to find other radfems. All this kind of puts debates about Twitter in a different light for me. Maybe the problem isn’t that it was restricting content, but that it was unclear about what the rules were and marketed itself as a general discussion platform instead of a Democrat/establishment/pharma platform. Maybe people don’t even want a general discussion platform unless there is a chance to get out of the “lobby” and into more restricted groups within the platform.