Matt Corallo [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-08-24 📝 Original message:BIP 111 was assigned, pull ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-08-24
📝 Original message:BIP 111 was assigned, pull request (with the proposed changes) available
at
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/183Matt
On 08/24/15 18:00, Peter Todd wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:37:51PM +0000, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> Its more of a statement of "in the future, we expect things to happen
>> which would make this an interesting thing to do, so we state here that
>> it is not against spec to do so". Could reword it as "NODE_BLOOM is
>> distinct from NODE_NETWORK, and it is legal to advertise NODE_BLOOM but
>> not NODE_NETWORK (though there is little reason to do so now, some
>> proposals may make this more useful in the future)"?
>
> ACK
>
Published at
2023-06-07 15:49:07Event JSON
{
"id": "92c5fc8a4d51d8b141cb763824759abe2da3735b9bcf93377c8e0781fa6017db",
"pubkey": "cd753aa8fbc112e14ffe9fe09d3630f0eff76ca68e376e004b8e77b687adddba",
"created_at": 1686152947,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"677b2789bd9260c9edc4dfff20558f27945c985e840da0da606941d73d12b50b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"fa1b1c3c48f24482c1c4413679643b993d0e1011a141f06022a4acf5b618771d",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-24\n📝 Original message:BIP 111 was assigned, pull request (with the proposed changes) available\nat https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/183\n\nMatt\n\nOn 08/24/15 18:00, Peter Todd wrote:\n\u003e On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:37:51PM +0000, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e\u003e Its more of a statement of \"in the future, we expect things to happen\n\u003e\u003e which would make this an interesting thing to do, so we state here that\n\u003e\u003e it is not against spec to do so\". Could reword it as \"NODE_BLOOM is\n\u003e\u003e distinct from NODE_NETWORK, and it is legal to advertise NODE_BLOOM but\n\u003e\u003e not NODE_NETWORK (though there is little reason to do so now, some\n\u003e\u003e proposals may make this more useful in the future)\"?\n\u003e \n\u003e ACK\n\u003e",
"sig": "c43cb20a93e8dce149aa647fd376b4825d7f2fa0ee65e54ac7f966bfa133bcf107a5dae109efa9d322a9dea2a90865ba3cac9a87bbc23103225870bd30baee0d"
}