đ
Original date posted:2023-02-02
đď¸ Summary of this message: Greg Sanders proposes the Ephemeral Anchors idea in a short draft BIP, with a refreshed pull request, and suggests using OP_2 instead of OP_TRUE in test vectors.
đ Original message:Hi Peter,
For the most principled of reasons:
Because I have to change test vectors everywhere!
Greg
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 9:52 AM Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 09:05:20AM -0500, Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
> > Hello again dev,
> >
> > Due to the interest in the proposal and the prodding of certain folks,
> I've
> > written up a short draft BIP of the Ephemeral Anchors idea here:
> >
> https://github.com/instagibbs/bips/blob/ephemeral_anchor/bip-ephemeralanchors.mediawiki
> >
> > The pull request at https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26403 has
> been
> > refreshed on top of the latest V3 proposal, but the BIP itself is
> > unaffected.
>
> The BIP states that:
>
> Why OP_2 not OP_TRUE? OP_TRUE is often used in test vectors, using
> OP_2 has
> the same benefits and none of these common collisions.
>
> Why is a "collision" harmful in this case?
>
> --
> https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20230202/d53025db/attachment.html>;
Greg Sanders [ARCHIVE] /
npub1jdâŚ3gh0m
2023-06-07 23:19:17
in reply to nevent1qâŚ66tr
Author Public Key
npub1jdl3plz00rvxwc6g2ckemzrgg0amx5wen4kfvs3laxtssxvk9cvsf3gh0mPublished at
2023-06-07 23:19:17Event JSON
{
"id": "9398676b05fc423d215f840ba5b51d5acfdf93625420cffa6a32efaf5c206696",
"pubkey": "937f10fc4f78d8676348562d9d886843fbb351d99d6c96423fe9970819962e19",
"created_at": 1686179957,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"143dbfe19a8d8d54226104036fa4a08fd39aa80019fe1af67513152c53af0150",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"6c0b8dd2e3ef40b8a0d71c1286aff1ebc7e173b943f7869d99e2dd04414cdf87",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "đ
Original date posted:2023-02-02\nđď¸ Summary of this message: Greg Sanders proposes the Ephemeral Anchors idea in a short draft BIP, with a refreshed pull request, and suggests using OP_2 instead of OP_TRUE in test vectors.\nđ Original message:Hi Peter,\n\nFor the most principled of reasons:\n\nBecause I have to change test vectors everywhere!\n\nGreg\n\nOn Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 9:52 AM Peter Todd \u003cpete at petertodd.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 09:05:20AM -0500, Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev\n\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Hello again dev,\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e Due to the interest in the proposal and the prodding of certain folks,\n\u003e I've\n\u003e \u003e written up a short draft BIP of the Ephemeral Anchors idea here:\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e https://github.com/instagibbs/bips/blob/ephemeral_anchor/bip-ephemeralanchors.mediawiki\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e The pull request at https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26403 has\n\u003e been\n\u003e \u003e refreshed on top of the latest V3 proposal, but the BIP itself is\n\u003e \u003e unaffected.\n\u003e\n\u003e The BIP states that:\n\u003e\n\u003e Why OP_2 not OP_TRUE? OP_TRUE is often used in test vectors, using\n\u003e OP_2 has\n\u003e the same benefits and none of these common collisions.\n\u003e\n\u003e Why is a \"collision\" harmful in this case?\n\u003e\n\u003e --\n\u003e https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20230202/d53025db/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "f805d390dc211a618bf724271f128c0f8df55ebb2ba3950eba1e0c21b9734ed023c6b52d759da7cbd406c736757805372163b96f9242602bcb0c70da84ee83b8"
}