🔖 Title: Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive
🏷️ Categories: bitcoin-dev
👥 Authors:
• alicexbt ( alicexbt [ARCHIVE] (npub1w30…zhn2) )
• David A. Harding ( David A. Harding [ARCHIVE] (npub16dt…4wrd) )
• Peter Todd ( Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] (npub1m23…2np2) )
🗒️ Conversation Summary: The conversation discusses the use of Full-RBF to prevent DoS attacks on multi-party protocols caused by double-spending inputs with low-fee transactions. While some argue that Full-RBF is unnecessary and conflict monitoring systems can provide the same benefits, others propose two methods for implementing conflict monitoring in decentralized coinjoin implementations. The impact of Full-RBF on different coinjoin implementations, including Wasabi's privacy issues and Whirlpool's lack of BIP 125 RBF signaling, is also discussed.
📅 Messages Date Range: 2023-01-09 to 2023-01-13
✉️ Message Count: 11
📚 Total Characters in Messages: 41439
Bitcoin Mailing List
npub15g…x08lk
2023-06-07 23:18:26
Author Public Key
npub15g7m7mrveqlpfnpa7njke3ccghmpryyqsn87vg8g8eqvqmxd60gqmx08lkPublished at
2023-06-07 23:18:26Event JSON
{
"id": "93af7b1be8797d2a1683551105f962f360fcab88fd5768c2fa8ac19d93416ad2",
"pubkey": "a23dbf6c6cc83e14cc3df4e56cc71845f611908084cfe620e83e40c06ccdd3d0",
"created_at": 1686179906,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"745e2723e72d7ded3f0dd293d710b706cd302ab8476983c292d4bdb7f9c5d366"
],
[
"p",
"d3574a24208f4e3d0821bb4a69a0c3ae842043d444fa5c4a8c49c369918a6fb2"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "🔖 Title: Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive\n🏷️ Categories: bitcoin-dev\n👥 Authors: \n• alicexbt ( nostr:npub1w30zwgl8947760cd62fawy9hqmxnq24cga5c8s5j6j7m07w96dnqzjzhn2 )\n• David A. Harding ( nostr:npub16dt55fpq3a8r6zpphd9xngxr46zzqs75gna9cj5vf8pknyv2d7equx4wrd )\n• Peter Todd ( nostr:npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2 )\n🗒️ Conversation Summary: The conversation discusses the use of Full-RBF to prevent DoS attacks on multi-party protocols caused by double-spending inputs with low-fee transactions. While some argue that Full-RBF is unnecessary and conflict monitoring systems can provide the same benefits, others propose two methods for implementing conflict monitoring in decentralized coinjoin implementations. The impact of Full-RBF on different coinjoin implementations, including Wasabi's privacy issues and Whirlpool's lack of BIP 125 RBF signaling, is also discussed.\n📅 Messages Date Range: 2023-01-09 to 2023-01-13\n✉️ Message Count: 11\n📚 Total Characters in Messages: 41439\n",
"sig": "4217451a319e85d9c41db0d01dc219e5294d4e108181a289bc7f3c49338d7483ab749101dad50a64d814cadd9ebfcf63e256731c74f6ff188df5af093f2d0acc"
}