📅 Original date posted:2014-01-13
📝 Original message:On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:10:56PM -0800, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Uh while I'm responding again, what I'd discussed with Peter Todd in
> IRC used two EC points in the stealth address. One for the payment and
> one for the ECDH. The reason to use two is that it makes delegating
> detection possible and so you don't have to have you spending keys
> online to even detect these payments. Why'd that get dropped?
I mentioned it again in another email; I just forgot to include it in my
final write-up.
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000023d5a8bbe131414328a6c50a2741933ba03775afd3c3db395
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140113/276bfc39/attachment.sig>;
Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m2…a2np2
2023-06-07 15:11:52
in reply to nevent1q…ken8
Author Public Key
npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2Published at
2023-06-07 15:11:52Event JSON
{
"id": "93a44d0bac355503b45bcdb08531fa6ea052117abc5535bfc5be8edf7eb27615",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686150712,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6b79d8c7bec3dc6952db91cc68d0510d9897c37dcf58a24d8e2f4288fe42525c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"eb1d5227d70a6608da8c3f99ffc10abf8bc538fa885fda463597a78b39df168a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-01-13\n📝 Original message:On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:10:56PM -0800, Gregory Maxwell wrote:\n\u003e Uh while I'm responding again, what I'd discussed with Peter Todd in\n\u003e IRC used two EC points in the stealth address. One for the payment and\n\u003e one for the ECDH. The reason to use two is that it makes delegating\n\u003e detection possible and so you don't have to have you spending keys\n\u003e online to even detect these payments. Why'd that get dropped?\n\nI mentioned it again in another email; I just forgot to include it in my\nfinal write-up.\n\n-- \n'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n00000000000000023d5a8bbe131414328a6c50a2741933ba03775afd3c3db395\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 490 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140113/276bfc39/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "a65671fa42b0a280a7b6e89a0788658d3e5e08164987a6b5308cc5d8ec24896e0cca6d1f4baa3694fd76e836ff1baecb07d4d7435595c776017d47c65b2df978"
}