📅 Original date posted:2015-04-16
📝 Original message:On Apr 16, 2015 1:46 AM, "s7r" <s7r at sky-ip.org> wrote:
> but for transaction versions? In simple terms, if > 75% from all the
> transactions in the latest 1000 blocks are version 'n', mark all
> previous transaction versions as non-standard and if > 95% from all the
> transactions in the latest 1000 blocks are version 'n' mark all previous
> transaction versions as invalid.
What problem are you trying to solve?
The reason why BIP62 (as specified, it is just a draft) does not make v1
transactions invalid is because it is opt-in. The creator of a transaction
needs to agree to protect it from malleability, and this subjects him to
extra rules in the creation.
Forcing v3 transactions would require every piece of wallet software to be
changed.
--
Pieter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150415/a603225e/attachment.html>;
Pieter Wuille [ARCHIVE] /
npub1tj…jtl6r
2023-06-07 15:32:30
in reply to nevent1q…qewk
Author Public Key
npub1tjephawh7fdf6358jufuh5eyxwauzrjqa7qn50pglee4tayc2ntqcjtl6rPublished at
2023-06-07 15:32:30Event JSON
{
"id": "9d33d51e13c5b2be96b14d065609608ab7f59262997ffa2883b4df9776bfdc88",
"pubkey": "5cb21bf5d7f25a9d46879713cbd32433bbc10e40ef813a3c28fe7355f49854d6",
"created_at": 1686151950,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"8b8a2347eb8a1165154b18f1aa6b1f8a0b99712f1e1f9461e574d86e0b7c9986",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"9c447195a0f1e00b9d52b298a3ab385daa52a45fbdb76366729c1adeec2cdf2f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"3327325c47cd736ff7b6960a646e8e38456e62cb2aa3cee04ac2560680ca8a3c"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-04-16\n📝 Original message:On Apr 16, 2015 1:46 AM, \"s7r\" \u003cs7r at sky-ip.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e but for transaction versions? In simple terms, if \u003e 75% from all the\n\u003e transactions in the latest 1000 blocks are version 'n', mark all\n\u003e previous transaction versions as non-standard and if \u003e 95% from all the\n\u003e transactions in the latest 1000 blocks are version 'n' mark all previous\n\u003e transaction versions as invalid.\n\nWhat problem are you trying to solve?\n\nThe reason why BIP62 (as specified, it is just a draft) does not make v1\ntransactions invalid is because it is opt-in. The creator of a transaction\nneeds to agree to protect it from malleability, and this subjects him to\nextra rules in the creation.\n\nForcing v3 transactions would require every piece of wallet software to be\nchanged.\n\n-- \nPieter\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150415/a603225e/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "f09742c6907de840893e0e7e09b5ea0ad52f806c808a45d4bba270c4f5c8825dbed729024737031d2a868fa9f4ac4923f24899690a4ccf364325cd5dd8ff739c"
}