4. WTF does that mean? Well, Roberts is essentially establishing a concurrence in Bush v. Gore as precedent
In that case, 3 justices wrote that the Florida Supreme Court's order to recount certain ballots exceeded "ordinary statutory interpretation" and was invalid.
Judd Legum /
npub1nh…5xs4c
2023-06-28 23:48:36
in reply to nevent1q…46ue
Author Public Key
npub1nh7mk2szr2z5fsu42fwpd0rckwxa5pss67pz2x5urpf4q5pwdhhsx5xs4cPublished at
2023-06-28 23:48:36Event JSON
{
"id": "9a5d1dd8297e499ec3d65bd08f964339fd2b10c86452eb2375fa7d266a38b0ca",
"pubkey": "9dfdbb2a021a8544c395525c16bc78b38dda0610d782251a9c185350502e6def",
"created_at": 1687996116,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"62b2be8f5c43638689f5bd66718ee41e7525776ac2a8ec4ef4f76d552638f679",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"mostr",
"https://journa.host/users/juddlegum/statuses/110624513495749112"
]
],
"content": "4. WTF does that mean? Well, Roberts is essentially establishing a concurrence in Bush v. Gore as precedent\n\nIn that case, 3 justices wrote that the Florida Supreme Court's order to recount certain ballots exceeded \"ordinary statutory interpretation\" and was invalid.",
"sig": "06f8fe58feff361e6c9053cfdd3d41117d35555f5ceeffd0f545b63288618ac0a348ab9b0a1d3221aaad91f6a0a4bc3f2b098b7ede54b01820a7a83d40e4fb72"
}