The usage of L2 by the shitcooners doesn't make any sense.
ETHirium abandoned the utxo model alongside PoW later on because Bitcoin couldn't 'scale' in favor of the account/contract base model. The general assumption being that any use case that "couldn't scale on Bitcoin" would move to other chains. Bitcoin opted to scale in Layers to retain the UTXO set while shitcoiners didn't think it was possible to do so. They pretty much made new chains everyday. Different scaling methodologies from the get go.
So what the hell is a Layer 2 in ETH? It's like admitting their whole reason to exist is pointless.
Dumbass shitcoiners 😤
Nyoro~n
npub1zw…pqlfd
2024-07-14 23:42:30
in reply to nevent1q…ut3n
Author Public Key
npub1zwyrus8vrvv5pfj4lfmk44wnxajk56rk0959nqugzj9ewljk258sxpqlfdPublished at
2024-07-14 23:42:30Event JSON
{
"id": "9ad2fd059ab6cf2203b8f2d0f24cc716a2247553f6452a62ed4dc675aaef7825",
"pubkey": "13883e40ec1b1940a655fa776ad5d337656a68767968598388148b977e56550f",
"created_at": 1721000550,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"2a8978c61a919353b84af4910c70597e29a53ca2eae292cede6470125509771d",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"9d065f84c0cba7b0ef86f5d2d155e6ce01178a8a33e194f9999b7497b1b2201b"
]
],
"content": "The usage of L2 by the shitcooners doesn't make any sense.\n\nETHirium abandoned the utxo model alongside PoW later on because Bitcoin couldn't 'scale' in favor of the account/contract base model. The general assumption being that any use case that \"couldn't scale on Bitcoin\" would move to other chains. Bitcoin opted to scale in Layers to retain the UTXO set while shitcoiners didn't think it was possible to do so. They pretty much made new chains everyday. Different scaling methodologies from the get go.\n\nSo what the hell is a Layer 2 in ETH? It's like admitting their whole reason to exist is pointless.\n\nDumbass shitcoiners 😤",
"sig": "625a70fe451fdec7e30dfe870cfa58eb3c4dfbc530df48bc0c86b40df5be5630456f113f6386a13ccce7896d8c04e701d41f5528070180e8fe4a248dfe82d84a"
}