📅 Original date posted:2013-12-08
📝 Original message:On 8 December 2013 21:01, Luke-Jr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
> On Sunday, December 08, 2013 8:51:07 PM Drak wrote:
> > Otherwise, who has admin rights to the code projects
> > (github/sourceforge/this mailing list)? Those people have proven they can
> > be trusted so far.
>
> Can someone explain how Sirius has proven the least bit untrustworthy?
It's not just about trust, there is the robustness factor: what if he
becomes sick, unavailable, hit by a bus? Others need the ability to pickup
and run with it. The control over the domain (including ability to renew
registration, alter nameservers) needs to be with more than one person.
That's why I suggest using the same people who have control over the
software project at sf,github.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131208/232210d7/attachment.html>;
Drak [ARCHIVE] /
npub12r…3aqxc
2023-06-07 15:10:26
in reply to nevent1q…huxx
Author Public Key
npub12rkw0jajmsck4uwdtksdvtswrlkypusfryjzera7m4fhqta6jhdsz3aqxcPublished at
2023-06-07 15:10:26Event JSON
{
"id": "9ad10061a8b76578f3fb3378200a5e5bbf399edf81e96f7589ded47e6369998d",
"pubkey": "50ece7cbb2dc316af1cd5da0d62e0e1fec40f20919242c8fbedd53702fba95db",
"created_at": 1686150626,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d517aa463a22abef5f03468f652eeefb44676da99926537d88111078c3e0468b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"bcca0ceef2d83cb41db4a90c8f9bdf446257479e07ac211350269f187a645c66",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"6ac6a519b554d8ff726a301e3daec0b489f443793778feccc6ea7a536f7354f1"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-12-08\n📝 Original message:On 8 December 2013 21:01, Luke-Jr \u003cluke at dashjr.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Sunday, December 08, 2013 8:51:07 PM Drak wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Otherwise, who has admin rights to the code projects\n\u003e \u003e (github/sourceforge/this mailing list)? Those people have proven they can\n\u003e \u003e be trusted so far.\n\u003e\n\u003e Can someone explain how Sirius has proven the least bit untrustworthy?\n\n\nIt's not just about trust, there is the robustness factor: what if he\nbecomes sick, unavailable, hit by a bus? Others need the ability to pickup\nand run with it. The control over the domain (including ability to renew\nregistration, alter nameservers) needs to be with more than one person.\nThat's why I suggest using the same people who have control over the\nsoftware project at sf,github.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131208/232210d7/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "9ec434cdb6e0d957dd6715a58cf159df7ff7ba25802e60f8ce0471632b9d8eae3278849811d65930275abf864b556e7648a2af0062d60c237ca28a10f83ca04d"
}