Tom Harding [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-06-01 📝 Original message:On 6/1/2015 10:21 AM, Adam ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-06-01
📝 Original message:On 6/1/2015 10:21 AM, Adam Back wrote:
> if it stays as is for a year, in a wait and see, reduce spam, see
> fee-pressure take effect as it has before, work on improving improve
> decentralisation metrics, relay latency, and do a blocksize increment
> to kick the can if-and-when it becomes necessary and in the mean-time
> try to do something more long-term ambitious about scale rather than
> volume.
What's your estimate of the lead time required to kick the can,
if-and-when it becomes necessary?
The other time-series I've seen all plot an average block size. That's
misleading, because there's a distribution of block sizes. If you bin
by retarget interval and plot every single block, you get this
The max block size has clearly been in play for 8 months already.
Published at
2023-06-07 15:36:17Event JSON
{
"id": "9ad4f549c87988b4414546b4e341dc183365a9acc43fb91a83a6cc0ed76e67a6",
"pubkey": "dc329a02c970aabf03b87185ef51c86afe4586fe3a148508af898af3fabc56a3",
"created_at": 1686152177,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"002637d80ed875256227e5e4145a83a9c5fadcaf42a66328cb5f3429df577734",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"00368319394d5fd4ea4736d101754e34d685165c36b280c23be4ce03d63b0efb",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-06-01\n📝 Original message:On 6/1/2015 10:21 AM, Adam Back wrote:\n\u003e if it stays as is for a year, in a wait and see, reduce spam, see\n\u003e fee-pressure take effect as it has before, work on improving improve\n\u003e decentralisation metrics, relay latency, and do a blocksize increment\n\u003e to kick the can if-and-when it becomes necessary and in the mean-time\n\u003e try to do something more long-term ambitious about scale rather than\n\u003e volume.\n\nWhat's your estimate of the lead time required to kick the can,\nif-and-when it becomes necessary?\n\nThe other time-series I've seen all plot an average block size. That's\nmisleading, because there's a distribution of block sizes. If you bin\nby retarget interval and plot every single block, you get this\n\nhttp://i.imgur.com/5Gfh9CW.png\n\nThe max block size has clearly been in play for 8 months already.",
"sig": "2b5b72eaa51fc46aee3091f0f95e964434458bb55bcf11f2eebfca3bdecd6fec78af7c42229d0ec329c11f1d576d09c1d8481e081a362a7d8aa907ecc251e919"
}