📅 Original date posted:2013-10-19
📝 Original message:On 2013-10-19, at 1:40 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> "I wasn't even allowed to edit the wiki"
>
> I'm confused about this, if he's referring to en.bitcoin.it. Editing
> it is open to anyone who is willing to pay the 0.01
> (https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BitcoinPayment) anti-spam fee. This isn't
> a policy set by the bitcoin development community, though I'm not sure
> that its a terrible one. I've both paid it on behalf of other users
> and made edits on behalf of people who didn't want to go to it. At
> least relative to some policy which requires actual approval the
> payment antispam is at least open to anyone with Bitcoin.
I have a question regarding this part. I wrote a BIP for base 58 encoding / encryption of BIP 32 root keys. The BIP page states that we shouldn't add to this list ourselves, but should contact you for a BIP number. I have contacted you a couple times on bitcointalk for a BIP number, but haven't received a response (or do those requests explicitly have to go to your email address)?
Proposal in question: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=258678.0
Cheers,
jp
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131019/198c2b9c/attachment.sig>;
Jean-Paul Kogelman [ARCHIVE] /
npub1sa…8y304
2023-06-07 15:07:34
in reply to nevent1q…yvkd
Author Public Key
npub1sa86gng3pvs3jgyt5majwcrhn8ck5qxgy9pjqxkh79u638cd7dys28y304Published at
2023-06-07 15:07:34Event JSON
{
"id": "9527053e3939e932f5373fe378dd81e551edd722819a2cc4650e14f03298176e",
"pubkey": "874fa44d110b2119208ba6fb27607799f16a00c82143201ad7f179a89f0df349",
"created_at": 1686150454,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d7c1869dab2bd34b6e5ae79cda5d73bda811a1af3e65276521fa77a929d2819d",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"439738bf60531b0ef7d4e1061d8dc1b5ac387ed58ea7a1052404f77cd0326cef",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"82787467b0f17468e9ce351232d23842b8a7b55e1a6e28ff41fe49c07870de35"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-10-19\n📝 Original message:On 2013-10-19, at 1:40 PM, Gregory Maxwell \u003cgmaxwell at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \n\u003e \"I wasn't even allowed to edit the wiki\"\n\u003e \n\u003e I'm confused about this, if he's referring to en.bitcoin.it. Editing\n\u003e it is open to anyone who is willing to pay the 0.01\n\u003e (https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BitcoinPayment) anti-spam fee. This isn't\n\u003e a policy set by the bitcoin development community, though I'm not sure\n\u003e that its a terrible one. I've both paid it on behalf of other users\n\u003e and made edits on behalf of people who didn't want to go to it. At\n\u003e least relative to some policy which requires actual approval the\n\u003e payment antispam is at least open to anyone with Bitcoin.\n\n\nI have a question regarding this part. I wrote a BIP for base 58 encoding / encryption of BIP 32 root keys. The BIP page states that we shouldn't add to this list ourselves, but should contact you for a BIP number. I have contacted you a couple times on bitcointalk for a BIP number, but haven't received a response (or do those requests explicitly have to go to your email address)? \n\nProposal in question: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=258678.0\n\n\nCheers,\n\njp\n\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 842 bytes\nDesc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131019/198c2b9c/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "037bb43bc296e480198f0a90628cc518a5681aa5ff1e90fcd198f9c3c82c38da8fcc6b72ccad777e91508298868997e4112b1b669b6189387cced99d7fbda6b3"
}