Thomas Zander [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-08-12 📝 Original message:On Tuesday 11. August 2015 ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-08-12
📝 Original message:On Tuesday 11. August 2015 21.51.59 Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> If people are doing transactions despite being unreliable, there
> must be a use for them.
Thats one usage of the form unreliable.
Yes, if people start getting their transactions thrown out because of full
blocks or full memory pools, then its unreliable to send stuff.
Much more importantly is the software is unreliable at such loads. Bitcoin
core will continue to grow in memory consumption, and eventually crash. Or,
worse, crash the system its running on.
We know of some issues in the software with regards to running at > 100%
capacity, I'm sure we'll find more when it actually happens.
IT experts are serious when they say that they avoid maxing out a system like
the plague.
This, btw, is a good scenario where more centralization ends up happening when
blocks are always full and people need to upgrade their client every week to
keep up with the bugfixes.
Published at
2023-06-07 17:33:54Event JSON
{
"id": "953dda7b34364a09de98494557c55cf8ba11a08edb2edd1badbdf087d4c23145",
"pubkey": "6f226bd1c86c22aed12ec82cd2dab4b5e2f77fd662ac4e1f881170a12da87bd6",
"created_at": 1686159234,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"0be39125a55b736c93365735a614c6c3adbad06ad3effa6f21e6b42bef7ccb51",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"26ecce1b322b3583b2c5040fe724b71c98cc2a3502520c6f601c5df8c9bb643e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"82205f272f995d9be742779a3c19a2ae08522ca14824c3a3b01525fb5459161e"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-12\n📝 Original message:On Tuesday 11. August 2015 21.51.59 Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e If people are doing transactions despite being unreliable, there\n\u003e must be a use for them.\n\nThats one usage of the form unreliable.\nYes, if people start getting their transactions thrown out because of full \nblocks or full memory pools, then its unreliable to send stuff.\n\nMuch more importantly is the software is unreliable at such loads. Bitcoin \ncore will continue to grow in memory consumption, and eventually crash. Or, \nworse, crash the system its running on.\nWe know of some issues in the software with regards to running at \u003e 100% \ncapacity, I'm sure we'll find more when it actually happens.\n\nIT experts are serious when they say that they avoid maxing out a system like \nthe plague.\n\nThis, btw, is a good scenario where more centralization ends up happening when \nblocks are always full and people need to upgrade their client every week to \nkeep up with the bugfixes.",
"sig": "bb95647595b1e62036913173390e618104b765014e11ee97f4fcd0fc69e988a5d3a7598df8d3e695da6cef3514f2fdbf61c5f312eab583a3069036bbd6686a30"
}