📅 Original date posted:2017-04-05
📝 Original message:On Tuesday, 4 April 2017 20:01:51 CEST Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> BIP 9 provides a mechanism for having
> miners coordinate softforks because they can make the upgrade process
> smoother this way. But the same is not true of hardforks: miners are
> essentially irrelevant to them, and cannot make the process any smoother.
Can you explain how miners are irrelevant if the upgrade is not a soft fork?
--
Tom Zander
Blog: https://zander.github.io
Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel
Tom Zander [ARCHIVE] /
npub1mj…dxnq7
2023-06-07 17:59:02
in reply to nevent1q…href
Author Public Key
npub1mju50kqcm07heu967fkq6h4kq666xgekc4yrldf7q52xx9vr8jnsrdxnq7Seen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 17:59:02Event JSON
{
"id": "953ece94e24013a483971fe9e06eede340ed10b19b8aa1d317b3896d3e7bf993",
"pubkey": "dcb947d818dbfd7cf0baf26c0d5eb606b5a32336c5483fb53e05146315833ca7",
"created_at": 1686160742,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"3909d155f1982e3a0b455d11e4ee4341d4be262d42cc407a1e3075f6c71d559b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"2341d62fe222ff9751e34217be39e0d32c673079fb212b89608d007f71c91bd3",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a9caed86d21b3cc6356c289ed2aeb2c219bf1d6b85255c98a935d53b4377ef20"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-04-05\n📝 Original message:On Tuesday, 4 April 2017 20:01:51 CEST Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e BIP 9 provides a mechanism for having\n\u003e miners coordinate softforks because they can make the upgrade process\n\u003e smoother this way. But the same is not true of hardforks: miners are\n\u003e essentially irrelevant to them, and cannot make the process any smoother.\n\nCan you explain how miners are irrelevant if the upgrade is not a soft fork?\n\n-- \nTom Zander\nBlog: https://zander.github.io\nVlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel",
"sig": "406307450ec4339c42538d22e7a772eec3c46721215f67655cddb167606fc9ddf1aefcbb4e42353100fea4278cbc9b9e2e16c4e9706dd95457e78154cc1e2bb4"
}