đź“… Original date posted:2015-07-30
đź“ť Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2015 10:12 PM, Jorge TimĂłn via bitcoin-dev wrote:
[snip]
> But even if I'm the only one that considers a "technological
> de-growth" possible, I don't think is wise to rely on pseudo-laws
> like Moore's or Nielsen’s so-called "laws". Stealing a quote from
> another thread:
You raise a good point: "de-growth"
Assuming linear (or exponential) growth without sympathetic
contraction at some time in the future would make our future selves
look back and smile at the youthful exuberance.
The pseudo-laws you mention (Moore's etc) do not cater for contraction
and, you're right, scaling UP plans should also wisely make provision
for scaling DOWN, for when the need arises.
>
> So I would prefer a more limited solution like bip102 (even though
> I would prefer to have some simulations leading to a concrete
> value (even if it's bigger) rather than using 2MB's arbitrary
> number.
I just had a look your existing Size N testnet code
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6382
and i'll set up a node over the weekend and post its address in that
PR's conversation. Do you or anyone else already have a node running?
what blocksize?
>
> Those are my 3 cents.
>
> [1]
> https://philohist.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/nietzsche-uses-history.pdf
Thanks,
>
will broaden my horizon soon!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVulKBAAoJEGwAhlQc8H1mUSAH/Rmlek3uitGyIritwyDO4Kf7
BfynlztWmPbnWl7aFYQCS+aIPgS+BvQWIiA0dTI633yj071DWEvcGDzhtcVrk0KT
//Ty8bp8yqsJRdd+SWgnqUzSmB6TI31F3ssxjDfSZhKiy8YF4+pKqjerQmBqlgLY
sKts3md8N8qWV5Onjd7ea+7SoFjhJ6GOm2UFgxO27LCeDH5Ax5fG4MsolNg3MBTT
5y7Hfo1YeFXRwRRSy5uCSSR0afBb8Wauqi/EnSYDuMe5HBcLztc7icXa6oLTlvBC
sfYswasmLRbvHLs4Vy51g75+k60QBjgFKtVlPXJXGN2trbcedF0UbDmenxGqJaI=
=rJPX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Venzen Khaosan [ARCHIVE] /
npub1uu…r4rpf
2023-06-07 15:44:15
in reply to nevent1q…llzt
Author Public Key
npub1uu2fve28mkg68uequseraz8gee7qg64733lr9r2g4c0xs5pmqnuslr4rpfPublished at
2023-06-07 15:44:15Event JSON
{
"id": "d100822ca908c4e3be79d4becd52f6f6a108a9cdf7b81067baa5ebd10e6bac3e",
"pubkey": "e714966547dd91a3f320e4323e88e8ce7c046abe8c7e328d48ae1e68503b04f9",
"created_at": 1686152655,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"a5089d8cc94280b0825961adbe16d28b69a12ea3db4d49196026224a1cf60689",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"42ebdf8076f9d8741bbd3ef17589d0b7a56860ceeb0211b9ce07a88c64b9f97d",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"45d091c7bcdbb8674dc8b91c60f7323053ab1432c4c882fd2d9897fe502eebed"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-07-30\n📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\nHash: SHA1\n\n\n\nOn 07/30/2015 10:12 PM, Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n[snip]\n\u003e But even if I'm the only one that considers a \"technological \n\u003e de-growth\" possible, I don't think is wise to rely on pseudo-laws\n\u003e like Moore's or Nielsen’s so-called \"laws\". Stealing a quote from\n\u003e another thread:\n\nYou raise a good point: \"de-growth\"\n\nAssuming linear (or exponential) growth without sympathetic\ncontraction at some time in the future would make our future selves\nlook back and smile at the youthful exuberance.\n\nThe pseudo-laws you mention (Moore's etc) do not cater for contraction\nand, you're right, scaling UP plans should also wisely make provision\nfor scaling DOWN, for when the need arises.\n\u003e \n\u003e So I would prefer a more limited solution like bip102 (even though\n\u003e I would prefer to have some simulations leading to a concrete\n\u003e value (even if it's bigger) rather than using 2MB's arbitrary\n\u003e number.\n\nI just had a look your existing Size N testnet code\nhttps://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6382\nand i'll set up a node over the weekend and post its address in that\nPR's conversation. Do you or anyone else already have a node running?\nwhat blocksize?\n\u003e \n\u003e Those are my 3 cents.\n\u003e \n\u003e [1]\n\u003e https://philohist.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/nietzsche-uses-history.pdf\n\nThanks,\n\u003e \nwill broaden my horizon soon!\n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\nVersion: GnuPG v1\n\niQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVulKBAAoJEGwAhlQc8H1mUSAH/Rmlek3uitGyIritwyDO4Kf7\nBfynlztWmPbnWl7aFYQCS+aIPgS+BvQWIiA0dTI633yj071DWEvcGDzhtcVrk0KT\n//Ty8bp8yqsJRdd+SWgnqUzSmB6TI31F3ssxjDfSZhKiy8YF4+pKqjerQmBqlgLY\nsKts3md8N8qWV5Onjd7ea+7SoFjhJ6GOm2UFgxO27LCeDH5Ax5fG4MsolNg3MBTT\n5y7Hfo1YeFXRwRRSy5uCSSR0afBb8Wauqi/EnSYDuMe5HBcLztc7icXa6oLTlvBC\nsfYswasmLRbvHLs4Vy51g75+k60QBjgFKtVlPXJXGN2trbcedF0UbDmenxGqJaI=\n=rJPX\n-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----",
"sig": "42326bd16694a417ec5b42ca95e6b4ccd31d9a66f5346cd0163c20ce3c59673910793711981d9ad134a0c06b805a90bcbf8b2fae89b311031809b303029bc0c8"
}