SamuelAdams on Nostr: You can’t be too ruthless verbally, that’s against their terms and conditions. ...
You can’t be too ruthless verbally, that’s against their terms and conditions.
People debate whether threats of violence are first amendment protected speech. Currently our courts and most people say, No.
Concerning our politicians the very next amendment clears that up.
The #2A is a threat of violence to government run amok.
I’m just the messenger.
Published at
2024-03-22 15:45:59Event JSON
{
"id": "d13e492365036091478bb0656edcbc022c944b4210499445ba18955ce88e2c03",
"pubkey": "59b78ed98e783a69fbc944e744c8dbd507b40e7b93d7261321545305ab49c93b",
"created_at": 1711122359,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"55c2bfcc616f0c4b44ecf939cc2daf00c3fcdd0d8929840d57841dfe4ef40c36",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"1cf75683d02b4ec0aa4d2127ff45d335fe2ef5a884b5794775d608bace006a16"
],
[
"e",
"220c1a7eccb34a826187b064bcc0925364026d5262fbda43e53b7ad2d900d159",
"",
"root"
]
],
"content": "You can’t be too ruthless verbally, that’s against their terms and conditions. \n\nPeople debate whether threats of violence are first amendment protected speech. Currently our courts and most people say, No. \n\nConcerning our politicians the very next amendment clears that up. \n\nThe #2A is a threat of violence to government run amok. \n\nI’m just the messenger.",
"sig": "7f32cdcd14f4ca7bb94ca8c4f270a4d1b01a893ca05a31481e1a8ea91f224bc048cc9aafd5369efc77fe76e4bb1c50f9aec26be20f0a55f3ba5d9c46f1aefe97"
}