📅 Original date posted:2015-12-31
📝 Original message:> So I'm very strongly against this "generalized softfork" idea -- I also
> don't
> see how upgraded nodes and non-upgraded nodes can possibly end up with
> the same
> UTXO set.
The only way for non-upgraded nodes to get the correct UTXO set is to
upgrade.
It is important to keep in mind this was proposed as an alternative to a
hardfork. With a hardfork the UTXOs also diverge as upgraded and
non-upgraded clients follow different chains.
--joe.
joe2015 at openmailbox.org [ARCHIVE] /
npub1gw…hphxp
2023-06-07 17:47:15
in reply to nevent1q…6czr
Author Public Key
npub1gwmm2y87243ku554j225754cr4ld7zmy5uajdkpmgd9cnvaey7cs4hphxpPublished at
2023-06-07 17:47:15Event JSON
{
"id": "d25f6d10cbd2b888903e211e0553bd6ea5f3496274f6e1c28870aeffd44225aa",
"pubkey": "43b7b510fe55636e529592954f52b81d7edf0b64a73b26d83b434b89b3b927b1",
"created_at": 1686160035,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"cff63604c5ea2135194b6bb6cc24978162ba68b9dba72176ba103744f1094f89",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"7cc3fec091d101275dce7cda50b5b88c8887681656cba30984ce2e7cb698d8e1",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a4fc2fc2bfc061e75a1b6e17dfc4b3c93b85fab2fc91001f44fd8499d672b169"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-12-31\n📝 Original message:\u003e So I'm very strongly against this \"generalized softfork\" idea -- I also \n\u003e don't\n\u003e see how upgraded nodes and non-upgraded nodes can possibly end up with \n\u003e the same\n\u003e UTXO set.\n\nThe only way for non-upgraded nodes to get the correct UTXO set is to \nupgrade.\n\nIt is important to keep in mind this was proposed as an alternative to a \nhardfork. With a hardfork the UTXOs also diverge as upgraded and \nnon-upgraded clients follow different chains.\n\n--joe.",
"sig": "94c8beafc4c099e600d68fa725d366171533c22ed364fc7d544d3117e5c1e673178244e1454f1000f8606f14478dd980d97852fd71d1a57b01acae26e9b437e8"
}