Rusty Russell [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2018-12-02 📝 Original message: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj at ...
📅 Original date posted:2018-12-02
📝 Original message:
ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj at protonmail.com> writes:
>> 128-bit seed in
>> open_channel2 could be added, with sorting by SHA(seed | <marshal of
>> input> | <marshal of witness>) and SHA(seed | <marshal of output>)?
>
> `open_channel2` contains a good amount of entropy --- temporary channel ID, various basepoints.
> Would not hashing `open_channel2` to get this `seed` be sufficient?
Good point. Something we already have to remember would be ideal, so
any of the basepoints would work, and is not exposed onchain.
seed = revocation_basepoint of open_channel2?
Cheers,
Rusty.
Published at
2023-06-09 12:53:16Event JSON
{
"id": "d323254eb0c154b228f01b511b2ca26e8f5baa498ee6a9123025078bdad5daea",
"pubkey": "13bd8c1c5e3b3508a07c92598647160b11ab0deef4c452098e223e443c1ca425",
"created_at": 1686315196,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ff5ad68f03b81ff1e4d67ae765c86a3a4f9485953182dea4f651f8d167395f04",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"9456f7acb763eaab2e02bd8e60cf17df74f352c2ae579dce1f1dd25c95dd611c"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2018-12-02\n📝 Original message:\nZmnSCPxj \u003cZmnSCPxj at protonmail.com\u003e writes:\n\u003e\u003e 128-bit seed in\n\u003e\u003e open_channel2 could be added, with sorting by SHA(seed | \u003cmarshal of\n\u003e\u003e input\u003e | \u003cmarshal of witness\u003e) and SHA(seed | \u003cmarshal of output\u003e)?\n\u003e\n\u003e `open_channel2` contains a good amount of entropy --- temporary channel ID, various basepoints.\n\u003e Would not hashing `open_channel2` to get this `seed` be sufficient?\n\nGood point. Something we already have to remember would be ideal, so\nany of the basepoints would work, and is not exposed onchain.\n\nseed = revocation_basepoint of open_channel2?\n\nCheers,\nRusty.",
"sig": "d13484e6c320408832c7126383ef8c058080878b29a7df429d4842c5bbab318bf14cb6510b1c5fe15754566e7ed75f2880748c12a7694d31476379ade2a9b6fa"
}