📅 Original date posted:2015-10-05
📝 Original message:On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Fortunately I can say that while we certainly value your opinion, when peoples
> opinions are hard to read, as you indicated they can be, we should look at
> their actions. The group has followed the consensus rule quite rigorously,
> which I applaud.
What "consensus rule" do you refer to?
Indeed, I suggest you look to actions-- it's not hard to find changes
in Bitcoin Core that one contributor or another disliked. Did you try?
(In this case, I don't even believe we have any regulator
contributors that disagree).
-- even for changes that effected system consensus, in fact. These
things were not hard-forks, however, as there never has been one (+/-
terminology disputes); and part of the point I was making was that the
standard for that is different, and that these differences begin with
technological fundamentals.
Gregory Maxwell [ARCHIVE] /
npub1f2…crwet
2023-06-07 17:42:47
in reply to nevent1q…nrz3
Author Public Key
npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwetPublished at
2023-06-07 17:42:47Event JSON
{
"id": "d708777e5c4313f027e5630f1e7e30350337a95257f52543169d8251ba1274f8",
"pubkey": "4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73",
"created_at": 1686159767,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"8b171b0a181c0ea41f6054eb15f1f19559c90fd9ce9e5f5fc159720aea23cfd9",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"31ce7ae67d8342ddd2fc4704da90d5d12719d30047840714f057c43b2cd8249d",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a384795310cea1937dda4d01ee8f14ca734b9a7ab60c62114a5656706e15e47f"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-10-05\n📝 Original message:On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev\n\u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e Fortunately I can say that while we certainly value your opinion, when peoples\n\u003e opinions are hard to read, as you indicated they can be, we should look at\n\u003e their actions. The group has followed the consensus rule quite rigorously,\n\u003e which I applaud.\n\nWhat \"consensus rule\" do you refer to?\n\nIndeed, I suggest you look to actions-- it's not hard to find changes\nin Bitcoin Core that one contributor or another disliked. Did you try?\n (In this case, I don't even believe we have any regulator\ncontributors that disagree).\n-- even for changes that effected system consensus, in fact. These\nthings were not hard-forks, however, as there never has been one (+/-\nterminology disputes); and part of the point I was making was that the\nstandard for that is different, and that these differences begin with\ntechnological fundamentals.",
"sig": "3dc0ba782b287507ac2613fe5eb748bbf2f1391f9fe606afbbd94f26e156d10d2fa5fd82571004b5ea572c5117b9f34c36f0e102dbdeb358508e27e69bab6ec5"
}