Farley on Nostr: THE CORE DEBATE: MONETARY NETWORK VS. "BLOCKCHAIN UTILITY" Bitcoin Mechanic’s ...
THE CORE DEBATE: MONETARY NETWORK VS. "BLOCKCHAIN UTILITY"
Bitcoin Mechanic’s Argument:
Bitcoin’s primary purpose is sound money, not a "general-purpose blockchain."
Polluting the UTXO set with non-monetary data risks bloat, higher fees, and reduced fungibility.
Jameson Lopp’s Position (Controversial):
Supports Citrea (zk-rollups for Bitcoin), which embeds non-financial data.
Advocates for Ethereum-like features, which critics say dilute Bitcoin’s focus.
WHY THIS IS A BIG DEAL
✅ Monetary Purists Fear:
Turning Bitcoin into a "Swiss Army knife" weakens its core value proposition.
Spam attacks (like Ordinals) already exploit block space, driving up fees for real users.
Corporate capture (via sidechains/L2s that demand protocol changes).
⚠️ "Utility" Advocates Claim:
Innovation shouldn’t be stifled; Bitcoin can "do more" without harming its monetary role.
Critics Counter: Ethereum already exists for this—why corrupt Bitcoin?
GITHUB BAN & CENSORSHIP CONCERNS
Bitcoin Mechanic was banned for suggesting Lopp’s stance might be influenced by financial ties to Citrea.
This raises red flags:
Is Bitcoin development being steered by investor interests rather than cypherpunk principles?
Should conflicts of interest be disclosed when proposing protocol changes?
BITCOIN KNOTS AS AN ALTERNATIVE
A conservative fork of Bitcoin Core that rejects bloatware (like Ordinals).
Prioritizes minimalism, low fees, and monetary stability.
Why It Matters: If Core devs keep allowing spam, Knots could become the "true" Bitcoin for purists.
WHAT THIS MEANS FOR THE FUTURE
Risk: Bitcoin could lose its monetary focus and become a battleground for corporate L2s.
Opportunity: If purists resist, Bitcoin remains hard money—while altcoins handle "blockchain apps."
#KeepBitcoinHardMoney ⚡
P.S. When they say "Innovation!", ask:
"Why does ‘innovation’ always mean ‘making Bitcoin more like Ethereum’?"
The fight isn’t just about code—it’s about what Bitcoin stands for. 😏🏴☠️
(P.P.S. Run a Bitcoin Knots node if you want to vote with your hash power.)
Published at
2025-04-30 15:25:01Event JSON
{
"id": "de38872a8844b7d2e4f039883f3aeb72cca4a78e01b489e3bde273e371e5450b",
"pubkey": "4f47fc9248595f9540679fe79e391e660cf24811e6236813be2bd595e79f126c",
"created_at": 1746026701,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"keepbitcoinhardmoney"
]
],
"content": "THE CORE DEBATE: MONETARY NETWORK VS. \"BLOCKCHAIN UTILITY\"\n Bitcoin Mechanic’s Argument:\n Bitcoin’s primary purpose is sound money, not a \"general-purpose blockchain.\"\n Polluting the UTXO set with non-monetary data risks bloat, higher fees, and reduced fungibility.\n\n Jameson Lopp’s Position (Controversial):\n Supports Citrea (zk-rollups for Bitcoin), which embeds non-financial data.\n Advocates for Ethereum-like features, which critics say dilute Bitcoin’s focus.\n\nWHY THIS IS A BIG DEAL\n✅ Monetary Purists Fear:\n Turning Bitcoin into a \"Swiss Army knife\" weakens its core value proposition.\n Spam attacks (like Ordinals) already exploit block space, driving up fees for real users.\n Corporate capture (via sidechains/L2s that demand protocol changes).\n\n⚠️ \"Utility\" Advocates Claim:\n Innovation shouldn’t be stifled; Bitcoin can \"do more\" without harming its monetary role.\n Critics Counter: Ethereum already exists for this—why corrupt Bitcoin?\n\nGITHUB BAN \u0026 CENSORSHIP CONCERNS\n Bitcoin Mechanic was banned for suggesting Lopp’s stance might be influenced by financial ties to Citrea.\n This raises red flags:\n Is Bitcoin development being steered by investor interests rather than cypherpunk principles?\n Should conflicts of interest be disclosed when proposing protocol changes?\n\nBITCOIN KNOTS AS AN ALTERNATIVE\n A conservative fork of Bitcoin Core that rejects bloatware (like Ordinals).\n Prioritizes minimalism, low fees, and monetary stability.\n Why It Matters: If Core devs keep allowing spam, Knots could become the \"true\" Bitcoin for purists.\n\nWHAT THIS MEANS FOR THE FUTURE\n Risk: Bitcoin could lose its monetary focus and become a battleground for corporate L2s.\n Opportunity: If purists resist, Bitcoin remains hard money—while altcoins handle \"blockchain apps.\"\n\n#KeepBitcoinHardMoney ⚡\n\nP.S. When they say \"Innovation!\", ask:\n\"Why does ‘innovation’ always mean ‘making Bitcoin more like Ethereum’?\"\n\nThe fight isn’t just about code—it’s about what Bitcoin stands for. 😏🏴☠️\n\n(P.P.S. Run a Bitcoin Knots node if you want to vote with your hash power.)",
"sig": "d6dd2bcc190f37c7035273c2682fee9714117a5ca44a6b5ea47b7f5c40ea06ae7a51b2ce687b9e703bd11932f80faeeff4337d655bf86e85c1953666d90ad182"
}