📅 Original date posted:2023-02-04
🗒️ Summary of this message: A developer is seeking advice on what limit to set for a bitcoin-transactions nodejs module, with suggestions ranging from 512B to 520B.
📝 Original message:I don't know, what number would you advise? When I made the
bitcoin-transactions nodejs module some years ago the limit (from the
specs) was 512B
It's not a fork, super easy to do
And necessary because bitcoin on ground of I don't know what rule
allowing the IF/ENDIF "unlimited" storage just mimics ethereum for the
worse, and is again quite dubious to use
Le 04/02/2023 à 23:18, Christopher Allen a écrit :
> 520 because that is a similar limit in taproot? Some multiple of
> hash+signature+metadata to satisfy others (that still might not be
> satisfied by any choice).
Aymeric Vitte [ARCHIVE] /
npub15f…g5grz
2023-06-07 23:19:00
in reply to nevent1q…cdfd
Author Public Key
npub15fc36esk6dy2x4ptk2ner209rl9u0d736gr99edtu9knu9uny80s4g5grzPublished at
2023-06-07 23:19:00Event JSON
{
"id": "de2ccdd62d7e4a7573c15f736c31913258ade88472b21fa55ce93907e0b1ea8f",
"pubkey": "a2711d6616d348a3542bb2a791a9e51fcbc7b7d1d20652e5abe16d3e179321df",
"created_at": 1686179940,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"db7e30240de322a59459e6f6d735c7f019f73c8194514d70467812fbd7606451",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"5b18a90f9e9ca80b90b8789b9a142adb2411c59a4636c61cb9e5010f0a38a958",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"2a2be7532ec03e16fa6ff38360d30cc714893870cbd9fafbefeb1df2df858c4d"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2023-02-04\n🗒️ Summary of this message: A developer is seeking advice on what limit to set for a bitcoin-transactions nodejs module, with suggestions ranging from 512B to 520B.\n📝 Original message:I don't know, what number would you advise? When I made the\nbitcoin-transactions nodejs module some years ago the limit (from the\nspecs) was 512B\n\nIt's not a fork, super easy to do\n\nAnd necessary because bitcoin on ground of I don't know what rule\nallowing the IF/ENDIF \"unlimited\" storage just mimics ethereum for the\nworse, and is again quite dubious to use\n\n\nLe 04/02/2023 à 23:18, Christopher Allen a écrit :\n\u003e 520 because that is a similar limit in taproot? Some multiple of\n\u003e hash+signature+metadata to satisfy others (that still might not be\n\u003e satisfied by any choice).",
"sig": "d16d51774b50703070c031d9659bac2bd13016356c31f021b2a12a53a546522df39d05e35556897b744943ee348dde04f6b891699cb194826ca8388822d4e2bf"
}