Gavin Andresen [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š
Original date posted:2014-10-07 š Original message:On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at ...
š
Original date posted:2014-10-07
š Original message:On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Mike Hearn <mike at plan99.net> wrote:
>
>> Meanwhile, what I said *is* correct. New version numbers result in only
> a log print. Being hard forked off results in both log prints *and* the
> -alertnotify being run:
>
That is easy to change; I'll submit a pull request. It is a good idea to
get an -alertnotify sooner rather than later for EITHER a hard fork or a
soft-fork. Better to be told you have to upgrade while the block.version is
on its way to being a super-majority than after you are either hard-forked
off the main chain (or soft-forked).
I don't have any opinion on the hard- versus soft- fork debate. I think
either can work.
--
--
Gavin Andresen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20141007/788fa260/attachment.html>
Published at
2023-06-07 15:26:09Event JSON
{
"id": "de41a213b73302982cad53ee77f5891cd37ea2ff2879d517869e4bf19e05da89",
"pubkey": "857f2f78dc1639e711f5ea703a9fc978e22ebd279abdea1861b7daa833512ee4",
"created_at": 1686151569,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"b0d4dbe43a898155b6750ed1dce6a700ce007fe7f2dce49b1bbfe7e2cca60c4c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"81abd7fac396d3be50043e3940d16d1baefe696d295d488a35ca76b0f1eeb5cb",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2014-10-07\nš Original message:On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Mike Hearn \u003cmike at plan99.net\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Meanwhile, what I said *is* correct. New version numbers result in only\n\u003e a log print. Being hard forked off results in both log prints *and* the\n\u003e -alertnotify being run:\n\u003e\n\nThat is easy to change; I'll submit a pull request. It is a good idea to\nget an -alertnotify sooner rather than later for EITHER a hard fork or a\nsoft-fork. Better to be told you have to upgrade while the block.version is\non its way to being a super-majority than after you are either hard-forked\noff the main chain (or soft-forked).\n\nI don't have any opinion on the hard- versus soft- fork debate. I think\neither can work.\n\n-- \n--\nGavin Andresen\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20141007/788fa260/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "3bc2343d58aad9641a37e26169ec8613641aabea7ba2f084a7d3b20358f69948c2e62d8972e2e4d1f2c6f17b30697097a4cfe54756c24332e7941f9d84cba2a7"
}