📅 Original date posted:2022-07-10
📝 Original message:Hello ,
Thanks for the correction - it however boils down to the same principle :
diluting other holders, possibly excessively, if you miscalculate the coins
"lost".
Which boils down to the same question again : How would you definitively
know that coins are "lost" or simply not accessed for x amount of time?
Regards,
thenoblebot
On Sat, 9 Jul, 2022, 9:48 pm Peter Todd, <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 09:43:49PM +0400, naman naman wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This approach raises the obvious question : If someone hasn't had access
> to
> > their coins in a long time (yrs, decades, however you want to define it)
> -
> > and they wish to access/move them after such a time - isn't your proposal
> > simply taking away their ability to do so? Some might call it : stealing
> > their coins.
> >
> > How does one conclusively prove that "lost" coins are "lost forever"?
>
> Re-read the article:
> https://petertodd.org/2022/surprisingly-tail-emission-is-not-inflationary
>
> It has nothing to do with re-assigning ownership of coins.
>
> --
> https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220710/0ae17a8a/attachment.html>;
naman naman [ARCHIVE] /
npub170…0rw80
2023-06-07 23:11:25
in reply to nevent1q…sus2
Author Public Key
npub170nq032tl9edal23vwpkv44m6l02qw5m2q8qv9j6jn0urdssadlqr0rw80Seen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 23:11:25Event JSON
{
"id": "d5fda970a4baeea09c7a696848157cabd292134b00f15b2322dd4d316b51d26e",
"pubkey": "f3e607c54bf972defd5163836656bbd7dea03a9b500e06165a94dfc1b610eb7e",
"created_at": 1686179485,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"58ba5412c6c2b5602710ac2f4e1819c2f92facaa3c9fa557b2ad25c78b5dd662",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"cb003174112aebf0cce0201d66d88362da93b391707b656817d218ae9cc271e3",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2022-07-10\n📝 Original message:Hello ,\n\nThanks for the correction - it however boils down to the same principle :\ndiluting other holders, possibly excessively, if you miscalculate the coins\n\"lost\".\n\nWhich boils down to the same question again : How would you definitively\nknow that coins are \"lost\" or simply not accessed for x amount of time?\n\nRegards,\nthenoblebot\n\nOn Sat, 9 Jul, 2022, 9:48 pm Peter Todd, \u003cpete at petertodd.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 09:43:49PM +0400, naman naman wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Hi,\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e This approach raises the obvious question : If someone hasn't had access\n\u003e to\n\u003e \u003e their coins in a long time (yrs, decades, however you want to define it)\n\u003e -\n\u003e \u003e and they wish to access/move them after such a time - isn't your proposal\n\u003e \u003e simply taking away their ability to do so? Some might call it : stealing\n\u003e \u003e their coins.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e How does one conclusively prove that \"lost\" coins are \"lost forever\"?\n\u003e\n\u003e Re-read the article:\n\u003e https://petertodd.org/2022/surprisingly-tail-emission-is-not-inflationary\n\u003e\n\u003e It has nothing to do with re-assigning ownership of coins.\n\u003e\n\u003e --\n\u003e https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220710/0ae17a8a/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "9b528f4e2938df8c127829f8c6973908f3d039d34b1305eeef3ce9d748b7c6821192b3bec06f23b1f0d313d23ca3595ed61cd8bafafa7316849d31f4bc56edab"
}