Why Nostr? What is Njump?
2023-06-07 02:43:19
in reply to

Amir Taaki [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2011-12-15 🗒️ Summary of this message: Bitcoin ...

📅 Original date posted:2011-12-15
🗒️ Summary of this message: Bitcoin developers discuss reusing code for IP transactions to enable dynamic address lookup and mitigate security flaws, with minimal protocol extension.
📝 Original message:This is maybe the best idea. I added it:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0015#IP_Transactions

Things I like about this:
- IP transactions are useful, but have a security flaw. This mitigates their security problems.
- The code for IP transactions is already in Satoshi client. If other clients want to add IP transactions, then it can be done with minimal fuss/bloat.
I feel that for any protocol extension, less is more. The less code
needed, the better the extension. Not always but generally we want to
avoid bitcoin protocol bloat which *will* happen far in the future. The
only way to mitigate how spaghettified the standard will be in the
future, is by careful cautious planning now.

- We can have a proxy node running 24/7 for us, serving our public keys in lieu of us.



________________________________
From: theymos <theymos at mm.st>
To: bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP 15] Aliases

Bitcoin already has code and a protocol for transactions to IP
addresses. Why not reuse that for dynamic address lookup? Just a few
changes are necessary to enable complete user at server.com handling:
- Extend the protocol so that "reply" messages can be signed by a fixed
  public key
- Extend "checkorder" messages so they can specify an account to
  send BTC to. Or standardize on how to put the account into the
  message field.
- Enable DNS lookups for IP transactions. The DNS-only proposals could
  also be used here to avoid having to use the IP transaction protocol
  sometimes. The public key for signing "reply" messages can be gotten
  from TXT records. This will be safe with DNSSEC and Namecoin. With
  plain DNS Bitcoin could take a SSH-like approach and ask the user to
  verify the public key the first time it is used, remembering it later.

DoS attacks are already handled by the IP transactions code: the same IP
address is always given the same bitcoin address until it pays to that
bitcoin address.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 Tips for Better Server Consolidation
Server virtualization is being driven by many needs. 
But none more important than the need to reduce IT complexity
while improving strategic productivity.  Learn More!
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51507609/
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20111215/ea93e7ce/attachment.html>;
Author Public Key
npub1ep4j5tjp6cd2774hrx96vh845dwqzhe3z7n3a2a9uxdm2dajqpgscm3rel