š
Original date posted:2015-08-18
š Original message:A smaller block size would make this a soft fork, as unupgraded nodes would
consider the new blocks valid. It would only make things that were allowed
forbidden, which is the definition of a soft fork. For a hard fork, you
need to allow something that was previously invalid.
On Tuesday, August 18, 2015, jl2012 via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> s = 1.5MB. As the 1MB cap was set 5 years ago, there is no doubt that all
> types of technology has since improved by >50%. I don't mind making it a
> bit smaller but in that case not much valuable data could be gathered and
> the second objective of this experiment may not be archived.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150818/e459cb0b/attachment-0001.html>;
Micha Bailey [ARCHIVE] /
npub1g9ā¦323pl
2023-06-07 17:36:38
in reply to nevent1qā¦3w89
Author Public Key
npub1g97v5rt5sguagjk0cetckrhhmr3hded8u4vwe5keqphe7ye9tgfsv323plSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 17:36:38Event JSON
{
"id": "d829b7996c2ce8a64e4502cc5a7cbe11885df868c7f29d08019dd9a96cf47c2e",
"pubkey": "417cca0d748239d44acfc6578b0ef7d8e376e5a7e558ecd2d9006f9f13255a13",
"created_at": 1686159398,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"015c5ac0a5b1780b314fc0de46b00e614fb9247d46dfb61637d3d94fa76f544c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"fb1faa627c2437f36b793ca2b74fdaa56d6e12a360cf1b0505fe708e450a1686",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"b61e2e7ccbf4abd7f49715c62f4ac7a93cbdd5ead0316279c5f5fe9b18dd0aaa"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2015-08-18\nš Original message:A smaller block size would make this a soft fork, as unupgraded nodes would\nconsider the new blocks valid. It would only make things that were allowed\nforbidden, which is the definition of a soft fork. For a hard fork, you\nneed to allow something that was previously invalid.\n\nOn Tuesday, August 18, 2015, jl2012 via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e s = 1.5MB. As the 1MB cap was set 5 years ago, there is no doubt that all\n\u003e types of technology has since improved by \u003e50%. I don't mind making it a\n\u003e bit smaller but in that case not much valuable data could be gathered and\n\u003e the second objective of this experiment may not be archived.\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150818/e459cb0b/attachment-0001.html\u003e",
"sig": "a20bf179d6e937e4d5c98d938b613a708c9a5d592f41069e42089bf2a8ca4805e144964dd9605cd35b3820a0eb3bb31f4839497a1a253ad40165c8caca6770ba"
}