📅 Original date posted:2015-07-15
📝 Original message:
> > You could even offer negative fees for transactions that bring a channel
> > back to equilibrium. There could be a market for people making money
> > from bringing other peoples' channels back to equilibrium. This would
> > require either to step away from "net neutrality" (so, not the same fee
> > for every route / destination), or it would require some form of source
> > routing and explicitly setting the fees of intermediate nodes.
>
> Yes, this was suggested to me by Joseph Poon in a face-to-face
> conversation we had in San Francisco. It kind of blew my mind,
> actually. The fact that you discovered it too provides fairly
> convincing proof that you're smarter than me :)
Maybe :), but I'm not sure I invented it myself. I had a talk about
Amiko Pay at the Bitcoinference in Amsterdam, and someone in the
audience actually came up with this idea. I vaguely remember I was
already playing with the idea at that time, but I'm not really sure.
CJP
CJP [ARCHIVE] /
npub13q…cuzdm
2023-06-09 12:43:35
in reply to nevent1q…5al9
Author Public Key
npub13q863scgpsaanrjhfn7dd4h48lgnupgkcs828arzj4pckrq8hh6s4cuzdmPublished at
2023-06-09 12:43:35Event JSON
{
"id": "d1eed8343dcbce97c12b76f4879f902286258bacc0bbaabd9088393907fa8f91",
"pubkey": "880fa8c3080c3bd98e574cfcd6d6f53fd13e0516c40ea3f46295438b0c07bdf5",
"created_at": 1686314615,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"b051b897d36d9747c0a2ead17e2be0eb4114a547258d74b54d7d8da5c672c214",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"674ece99012027b00dd18d0b3213c06cdc4725b46df7e008c8bcece6789138ed",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"ccb4cc87c455b74febaee5929cfd0726421b2eea64ad2b16440b68e8c7433211"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-07-15\n📝 Original message:\n\u003e \u003e You could even offer negative fees for transactions that bring a channel\n\u003e \u003e back to equilibrium. There could be a market for people making money\n\u003e \u003e from bringing other peoples' channels back to equilibrium. This would\n\u003e \u003e require either to step away from \"net neutrality\" (so, not the same fee\n\u003e \u003e for every route / destination), or it would require some form of source\n\u003e \u003e routing and explicitly setting the fees of intermediate nodes.\n\u003e \n\u003e Yes, this was suggested to me by Joseph Poon in a face-to-face\n\u003e conversation we had in San Francisco. It kind of blew my mind,\n\u003e actually. The fact that you discovered it too provides fairly\n\u003e convincing proof that you're smarter than me :)\n\nMaybe :), but I'm not sure I invented it myself. I had a talk about\nAmiko Pay at the Bitcoinference in Amsterdam, and someone in the\naudience actually came up with this idea. I vaguely remember I was\nalready playing with the idea at that time, but I'm not really sure.\n\nCJP",
"sig": "d30016a1496dd5087984a515d1ae7ea1fe22e1096752a1ad84ece87a4ce6bcf05e45b5a754879542476cfd1f9dad88259bfe08261b25db8f2c36f469997ac2cb"
}