The research is flawed because it's based on the premise that COVID is anything other than the flu. The flu infection rates in year 1 and year 2 of "COVID" (near 0) compared with prior years and symptoms being identical is clear proof that the flu was relabeled.
For example, everyone always pointed to loss of taste and smell being unique to COVID. Did you know that those are flu symptoms there were removed from online flu descriptions at the start of COVID?
Kottonballs /
npub1w7…sut29
2023-09-26 14:10:11
in reply to nevent1q…xepg
Author Public Key
npub1w76cechf4eyz9jceza4vrv9zz3dr4exjkk08x5mgxc09633x2chqrsut29Published at
2023-09-26 14:10:11Event JSON
{
"id": "d1d95beaf763480f799fc2711baea7dd30e6865e13d7c34226258bf3c0ef0a0b",
"pubkey": "77b58ce2e9ae4822cb19176ac1b0a2145a3ae4d2b59e735368361e5d4626562e",
"created_at": 1695737411,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"3f9390544a9fe82c606a2912f87e5db1072446658c18335d2e1d6d4e27bf6205",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"8ce9c7924d4c9aaf7424c025c1bc61aab19c82d37fe0d67a8c458886244ef3b5",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://nicecrew.digital/objects/522b402b-d974-408a-b71f-1768b49257a7",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "The research is flawed because it's based on the premise that COVID is anything other than the flu. The flu infection rates in year 1 and year 2 of \"COVID\" (near 0) compared with prior years and symptoms being identical is clear proof that the flu was relabeled. \n\nFor example, everyone always pointed to loss of taste and smell being unique to COVID. Did you know that those are flu symptoms there were removed from online flu descriptions at the start of COVID?",
"sig": "371ba1848007fc847fd541a197c0baa5a5bab002714d58677dbd4bb5178c4bf7ff97587bfa9019e3242ce50a8698eaf0dd001f0c6e567542a8b9a10774819965"
}