📅 Original date posted:2015-08-18
📝 Original message:I honestly don't understand your position, but I get the sense that you are
suggesting Satoshi wouldn't be welcome to return if he wanted to be active
in development again?
Warren
On Aug 17, 2015 1:38 PM, "Oliver Egginger" <bitcoin at olivere.de> wrote:
> Am 17.08.2015 um 21:03 schrieb Warren Togami Jr.:
> > This bitcoin-dev list restarted with an empty subscriber list on June
> > 21st, 2015. So whoever posted from satoshi at vistomail.com
> > <mailto:satoshi at vistomail.com> subscribed and verified the address
> > recently. Do you propose that we manually approve new subscribers to
> > prevent these kind of "abuses" as you put it?
>
> I would simply block the creators old email addresses. Easy with
> Mailman. I thought that would be a good and easy approach, but maybe I'm
> wrong.
>
> Some believes it is possible that the email could be genuine. Some say
> that only the content is important. I have closely followed. An
> interesting discussion. Thank you all so far.
>
> But let's say the poster would be the real Satoshi. Would we discuss his
> posting if he would not claim to be Satoshi? There are a lot of smart
> people on this list, which publish occasionally quite useful ideas. But
> much of this is hardly the subject of greater discussion. Especially not
> when it comes to the blocksize. On this subject almost everything has
> been already said. But not yet by everyone. Especially not by Satoshi.
>
> Satoshi would have a decisive influence on the community. I'm sure. To
> say it does not matter who's talking is maybe genteelly but a little bit
> remote from everyday life. Or not? Satoshi is the creator. What he says
> is in the newspaper and is perceived by all. If he says it's okay to do
> nothing as long as we stand together, then people have the courage to do
> maybe something dangerous or something wrong. Then people only follow
> their hearts. Otherwise they follow their fear. It is a paradox of the
> human nature that some type of Dictatorship can make you free. I say
> some type, not any type. Enough said.
>
> - oliver
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150818/5961bb7c/attachment.html>;
Warren Togami Jr. [ARCHIVE] /
npub1s5…zxem8
2023-06-07 15:47:25
in reply to nevent1q…5mj9
Author Public Key
npub1s5p2xnl52ksr3a4qfa8re5znmja46ugm3x3ayy0x2c2mqrsw6ewsmzxem8Published at
2023-06-07 15:47:25Event JSON
{
"id": "dde6c7844b36b6b94d79b58ca2079896ff2632b9fc93b2a624ba5b1f4e2f8245",
"pubkey": "8502a34ff455a038f6a04f4e3cd053dcbb5d711b89a3d211e65615b00e0ed65d",
"created_at": 1686152845,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c2ea875b0594d5635a2a5ab9721c10059f40c62d11975dcc679e649aa5cf3f34",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"21f5289c797aecce3b74b5c93163cf0999063d3848f528c8c70dcfa96b091588",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-18\n📝 Original message:I honestly don't understand your position, but I get the sense that you are\nsuggesting Satoshi wouldn't be welcome to return if he wanted to be active\nin development again?\n\nWarren\nOn Aug 17, 2015 1:38 PM, \"Oliver Egginger\" \u003cbitcoin at olivere.de\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Am 17.08.2015 um 21:03 schrieb Warren Togami Jr.:\n\u003e \u003e This bitcoin-dev list restarted with an empty subscriber list on June\n\u003e \u003e 21st, 2015. So whoever posted from satoshi at vistomail.com\n\u003e \u003e \u003cmailto:satoshi at vistomail.com\u003e subscribed and verified the address\n\u003e \u003e recently. Do you propose that we manually approve new subscribers to\n\u003e \u003e prevent these kind of \"abuses\" as you put it?\n\u003e\n\u003e I would simply block the creators old email addresses. Easy with\n\u003e Mailman. I thought that would be a good and easy approach, but maybe I'm\n\u003e wrong.\n\u003e\n\u003e Some believes it is possible that the email could be genuine. Some say\n\u003e that only the content is important. I have closely followed. An\n\u003e interesting discussion. Thank you all so far.\n\u003e\n\u003e But let's say the poster would be the real Satoshi. Would we discuss his\n\u003e posting if he would not claim to be Satoshi? There are a lot of smart\n\u003e people on this list, which publish occasionally quite useful ideas. But\n\u003e much of this is hardly the subject of greater discussion. Especially not\n\u003e when it comes to the blocksize. On this subject almost everything has\n\u003e been already said. But not yet by everyone. Especially not by Satoshi.\n\u003e\n\u003e Satoshi would have a decisive influence on the community. I'm sure. To\n\u003e say it does not matter who's talking is maybe genteelly but a little bit\n\u003e remote from everyday life. Or not? Satoshi is the creator. What he says\n\u003e is in the newspaper and is perceived by all. If he says it's okay to do\n\u003e nothing as long as we stand together, then people have the courage to do\n\u003e maybe something dangerous or something wrong. Then people only follow\n\u003e their hearts. Otherwise they follow their fear. It is a paradox of the\n\u003e human nature that some type of Dictatorship can make you free. I say\n\u003e some type, not any type. Enough said.\n\u003e\n\u003e - oliver\n\u003e\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150818/5961bb7c/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "a4906fb153e1e568bed8c25fe6607417729e86f96e892821e8cc620ee6410cc587060df53a7ea4778e4c4aae6ee5df10575c1e4420632a373e9202ead5b934af"
}