ChrisMartl on Nostr: What about the IBD phase? I think, that’s the pruning which is being taking about; ...
What about the IBD phase? I think, that’s the pruning which is being taking about; a full-node which have a limited latest blocks in its ROM. Therefore, not useful for IBD.
Without having investigated in deep on the Utreexo topic, that would also mean an increment of the block size.
Another aspects about insertion of arbitrary bitstreams, is the possibility of regular Bitcoin node operators persecution for having bitstreams in their ROMs which could be interpreted as not tolerable by coercive authorities. This would have also the same effect of reducing the number of regular Bitcoin nodes spread around the world.
Published at
2023-08-03 11:59:16Event JSON
{
"id": "df8501056bfe3fe40ab724598ddff6bc00e2c926ad5bb6f89300533c3ed501ec",
"pubkey": "5341dedd0eed04d2bcc75d9c58f274ca741615c0c3a0a33ed0c6811f178fb15d",
"created_at": 1691063956,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"542caf40f81bed7c2f6bc203ae4a6c46ad96d65578a1f8b1210f29eddf3344f9"
],
[
"p",
"23a520d5bc0c4eccdbe8756a15355599482c9f35e550133b752dbba1c984e15b"
]
],
"content": "What about the IBD phase? I think, that’s the pruning which is being taking about; a full-node which have a limited latest blocks in its ROM. Therefore, not useful for IBD.\n\nWithout having investigated in deep on the Utreexo topic, that would also mean an increment of the block size.\n\nAnother aspects about insertion of arbitrary bitstreams, is the possibility of regular Bitcoin node operators persecution for having bitstreams in their ROMs which could be interpreted as not tolerable by coercive authorities. This would have also the same effect of reducing the number of regular Bitcoin nodes spread around the world.",
"sig": "af47e73c2308c922f92c76d9fa215babece721cdc3ff602f7a14234dd4ada2d19d34911209937b3f713779d4f2b356ed3167a66dacd586ce735b68f395ffa95a"
}
