š
Original date posted:2017-09-29
š Original message:On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:44:11AM +0200, Andreas Schildbach via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> On 09/29/2017 03:45 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:09:59PM +0200, Andreas Schildbach via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> >> This feels redundant to me; the payment protocol already has an
> >> expiration time.
> >
> > I'm well aware. As the payment protocol hasn't caught on - and doesn't fully
> > overlap all the usecases that addresses do anyway - I think we should consider
> > bringing this important feature to Bitcoin addresses too.
>
> Hasn't caught on? It is used for virtually all merchant transactions,
> plus person to person transactions between Bitcoin Wallet users.
"Virtually all"?
I regularly pay with Bitcoin, and I haven't seen the payment protocol used in
ages.
Can you name some users of it?
--
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170929/28b4c7ee/attachment.sig>;
Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m2ā¦a2np2
2023-06-07 18:06:27
in reply to nevent1qā¦7dy2
Author Public Key
npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2Published at
2023-06-07 18:06:27Event JSON
{
"id": "d936436283ee0ed276330b233b7e411e767bafe10194ba87f745d928ea8a5249",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686161187,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"02d8c76b933e43bf4fbef62deb34ae55389c59e653682f6f8847f8910b9dcb32",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"55bc8629073e41bae19f88863e2045d7bdff2633866d2612625cdeb46d799e47",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"3215b3d77dff1f84eeb5ad46fb1206a8d1657b3ea765a80b5489ece3a702d2bc"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2017-09-29\nš Original message:On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:44:11AM +0200, Andreas Schildbach via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e On 09/29/2017 03:45 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e \u003e On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:09:59PM +0200, Andreas Schildbach via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e \u003e\u003e This feels redundant to me; the payment protocol already has an\n\u003e \u003e\u003e expiration time.\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e I'm well aware. As the payment protocol hasn't caught on - and doesn't fully\n\u003e \u003e overlap all the usecases that addresses do anyway - I think we should consider\n\u003e \u003e bringing this important feature to Bitcoin addresses too.\n\u003e \n\u003e Hasn't caught on? It is used for virtually all merchant transactions,\n\u003e plus person to person transactions between Bitcoin Wallet users.\n\n\"Virtually all\"?\n\nI regularly pay with Bitcoin, and I haven't seen the payment protocol used in\nages.\n\nCan you name some users of it?\n\n-- \nhttps://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 455 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170929/28b4c7ee/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "a2f919fd74010462f305c1749961d262688da50a97e53a756eb1f5e1b1402559cd4ebfab1f6c5e22372037b9bcaa11bc008fe65e38e96406997e86cc22b20a97"
}