Soulexporter on Nostr: Ok, I have a question for the Bitcoin Brief 🤔 I want to invert the entire advice ...
Ok, I have a question for the Bitcoin Brief 🤔
I want to invert the entire advice and do the opposite ðŸ¤
I know address re-use is considered bad practice, but I was wondering,... And even numbers is easy to track, but imagine.
I chop up a big UTXO in smaller parts and make it an even number. Let's call it 1,001,000(*) Sats.
Now there is a chunk smaller than that left , the remainder. So I send out this remainder in the same action to a fixed address.
Now I do the same with another UTXO, but I denominate tlin smaller amounts, because it is easier. Again use same remainder destination address. Now there can be an assumption that both actions are same player. Yes.
Now I convinced another bunch of people to do the same, for the fixed address is not mine, but belongs to the wallet of f.e. A fundraiser these UTXO dividers agreed upon. 🤔
(*)The 1000 Sats extra are for fee in future where I want to use the smaller UTXO for.
Did I now decreased my privacy, increased my privacy ( aside of for those who are in on de fundraiser), or just made a fool out of myself?
PS: Stop typing, I know you want to help a poor dumb Soul, but keep it for the BB 😜
Published at
2024-09-04 07:52:58Event JSON
{
"id": "d969b8a5a84d2062e1238709c02967e2e358de7761d906cf1f06139e699160c0",
"pubkey": "feb2cefbe04f933f15da0803436aa62cbaacefa1cb03af1275b9acd16a14230d",
"created_at": 1725436378,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"a1846c4b6f69287f4c582394ac9ec6929c75a4a661cf1612fe100fad5cfb6038",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"a60e79e0edad5100d7543b669e513dbc1c2170e8e9b74fdb8e971afd1e0e6813"
]
],
"content": "Ok, I have a question for the Bitcoin Brief 🤔\n\nI want to invert the entire advice and do the opposite ðŸ¤\n\nI know address re-use is considered bad practice, but I was wondering,... And even numbers is easy to track, but imagine.\n\nI chop up a big UTXO in smaller parts and make it an even number. Let's call it 1,001,000(*) Sats. \nNow there is a chunk smaller than that left , the remainder. So I send out this remainder in the same action to a fixed address.\n\nNow I do the same with another UTXO, but I denominate tlin smaller amounts, because it is easier. Again use same remainder destination address. Now there can be an assumption that both actions are same player. Yes. \n\nNow I convinced another bunch of people to do the same, for the fixed address is not mine, but belongs to the wallet of f.e. A fundraiser these UTXO dividers agreed upon. 🤔\n\n(*)The 1000 Sats extra are for fee in future where I want to use the smaller UTXO for. \n\nDid I now decreased my privacy, increased my privacy ( aside of for those who are in on de fundraiser), or just made a fool out of myself?\n\nPS: Stop typing, I know you want to help a poor dumb Soul, but keep it for the BB 😜\n\n\n\n\n",
"sig": "f363be864cbe291d182c4ee90b8cfd6fcbc2f4923ae4b25ddd67a23f41cfda3c44addb0f0d979e1624dac6bb27713a3c99a908ddc22b687ff97fe8c9e799a863"
}