📅 Original date posted:2015-06-27
📝 Original message:Also remember that the sender is not the one who cares about delays or even
getting confirmations at all, it's the receiver who's concerned with these
things. They have to tell the sender up-front what they're willing to
accept in exchange for goods and services.
Aaron Voisine
co-founder and CEO
breadwallet.com
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Filipe Farinha <filipe at ktorn.com> wrote:
> On 27/06/2015 03:36, Peter Todd wrote:
>
>> * Make websites with easy to understand displays of what the current
>> mempool
>> backlog is, and what fee/KB is needed to get to the front of the
>> queue. We've
>> done a great job for Bitcoin price charts, let's extend that to
>> transaction
>> fees.
>>
>> +1
>
> This is especially important if take into account all the projects that
> aim to build upon the bitcoin blockchain and that can have a significant
> impact, both in terms of storage space as well as transaction volume spikes.
>
> Just recently I suggested the need for a BIP to standardize reporting of
> "delay alerts" in wallets, so that users can act accordingly (i.e.
> fee-bump, postpone, cancel) before sending their transactions during these
> periods of increased transaction volume.
>
>
> https://community.blockstack.org/t/blockstore-footprint-on-blockchain/68/5?u=ktorn
>
> IMHO keeping the users informed of potential issues before committing
> transactions to the network can go a long way towards preventing
> frustration and potential backlashes against blockchain tech.
>
> Filipe Farinha
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150627/f4084b54/attachment.html>;
Aaron Voisine [ARCHIVE] /
npub18g…knkzl
2023-06-07 15:40:33
in reply to nevent1q…vlfv
Author Public Key
npub18gjvug29c4yg46lmplq38e75gg6wn5mn8taytckcsr4jt8p74h3s5knkzlPublished at
2023-06-07 15:40:33Event JSON
{
"id": "d4043ac06018b140b48eea898e2bcc72ea12d043b1ecf8e13283d60676fd6447",
"pubkey": "3a24ce2145c5488aebfb0fc113e7d44234e9d3733afa45e2d880eb259c3eade3",
"created_at": 1686152433,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6b97b8772e4c3c0f5eb751746063b4217197a3eb7cab2fa3b16264082ad573c4",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"f23ba2dbe5de86b8917b3da1c3ede7653b5e069c580a70d3fb65e8ebdac14ca1",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4b009c11031469d31b3267a92ce245675d9b0021f26693e580f3eb3475e6464a"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-06-27\n📝 Original message:Also remember that the sender is not the one who cares about delays or even\ngetting confirmations at all, it's the receiver who's concerned with these\nthings. They have to tell the sender up-front what they're willing to\naccept in exchange for goods and services.\n\n\nAaron Voisine\nco-founder and CEO\nbreadwallet.com\n\nOn Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Filipe Farinha \u003cfilipe at ktorn.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On 27/06/2015 03:36, Peter Todd wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e * Make websites with easy to understand displays of what the current\n\u003e\u003e mempool\n\u003e\u003e backlog is, and what fee/KB is needed to get to the front of the\n\u003e\u003e queue. We've\n\u003e\u003e done a great job for Bitcoin price charts, let's extend that to\n\u003e\u003e transaction\n\u003e\u003e fees.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e +1\n\u003e\n\u003e This is especially important if take into account all the projects that\n\u003e aim to build upon the bitcoin blockchain and that can have a significant\n\u003e impact, both in terms of storage space as well as transaction volume spikes.\n\u003e\n\u003e Just recently I suggested the need for a BIP to standardize reporting of\n\u003e \"delay alerts\" in wallets, so that users can act accordingly (i.e.\n\u003e fee-bump, postpone, cancel) before sending their transactions during these\n\u003e periods of increased transaction volume.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e https://community.blockstack.org/t/blockstore-footprint-on-blockchain/68/5?u=ktorn\n\u003e\n\u003e IMHO keeping the users informed of potential issues before committing\n\u003e transactions to the network can go a long way towards preventing\n\u003e frustration and potential backlashes against blockchain tech.\n\u003e\n\u003e Filipe Farinha\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150627/f4084b54/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "dcb34c77b14f36248a3fb2e408211140e74b78fd6c5ff3d0262a45e04229ad6e465c2da9f302bc5194493fe0aaee84d5e7f9331f67c0faa6f54ae03fae04cb5a"
}