There is some confusion about Meadows "flipping."
https://abcnews.go.com/US/chief-staff-mark-meadows-granted-immunity-tells-special/story?id=104231281
Immunity is something else: This means essentially that he was forced to testify.
It works like this: If the DOJ gives use immunity, nothing he says can be used against him, so it's no longer possible to invoke the 5th Amendment.
(It's late so I'm not sure I explained it well.)
See:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/immunity#:~:text=“Transactional”%20immunity%20means%20that%20once,from%20or%20obtained%20because%20of
https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-718-derivative-use-immunity
Teri Kanefield /
npub10d…avnsf
2023-10-25 03:09:47
Author Public Key
npub10dw8nkvktm3kt87ylq3l4eneuwu5czczturc7ngdk3dr89tjcp4q4avnsfPublished at
2023-10-25 03:09:47Event JSON
{
"id": "d45a2877ae3246c44e58fd3af6428387f6d9445d616ecac264186c60774e2bb5",
"pubkey": "7b5c79d9965ee3659fc4f823fae679e3b94c0b025f078f4d0db45a339572c06a",
"created_at": 1698203387,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://law-and-politics.online/users/Teri_Kanefield/statuses/111293457204306034",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "There is some confusion about Meadows \"flipping.\"\n\nhttps://abcnews.go.com/US/chief-staff-mark-meadows-granted-immunity-tells-special/story?id=104231281\n\nImmunity is something else: This means essentially that he was forced to testify.\n\nIt works like this: If the DOJ gives use immunity, nothing he says can be used against him, so it's no longer possible to invoke the 5th Amendment.\n\n(It's late so I'm not sure I explained it well.) \n\nSee: \nhttps://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/immunity#:~:text=“Transactional”%20immunity%20means%20that%20once,from%20or%20obtained%20because%20of\n\nhttps://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-718-derivative-use-immunity",
"sig": "d8cf4dd6b4e27dee948452beb5e151f9539c77be313dbe23b4a3cc1b6b1793ad676948626d1c9eb3fbbea0956214ca2c14fc04098946536ca94d947794c09e8d"
}