📅 Original date posted:2014-03-28
📝 Original message:On 28/03/2014 17:59, Andreas Schildbach wrote:
> Ok, why don't fix this in the spec for now, by defining a fixed expiry
> time. In the EU, most products are covered by a 2 years warranty, so it
> seems appropriate to pick 2.5 years (30 months) -- allowing for some
> time to ship the product back and forth.
Yeah I was thinking something like that on the walk home. But 2 years is
a long time. Do we have enough RAM for that? Plus warranties usually
result in the defective goods being replaced rather than a monetary
refund, right?
But adjusting the spec so there's a fixed time limit, and allowing a
future version of the protocol to make it configurable, does indeed feel
like the right way to go.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5971 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140328/66e42ad9/attachment.p7s>;
Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] /
npub17t…4qgyd
2023-06-07 15:16:26
in reply to nevent1q…ccgk
Author Public Key
npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgydPublished at
2023-06-07 15:16:26Event JSON
{
"id": "dc9a08973cc0017c674f7e5f337fb2c9278478ce03cfd50e5d7d85be340a3052",
"pubkey": "f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2",
"created_at": 1686150986,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"a25f8c0e76247e71f1e93081191a63947cf2b3917beba6ba5a208801271421f4",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"333ab054f0c4c8092ad164cf8ed97085b20efcab1c6044c1b237a0a7a18af069",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"3215b3d77dff1f84eeb5ad46fb1206a8d1657b3ea765a80b5489ece3a702d2bc"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-03-28\n📝 Original message:On 28/03/2014 17:59, Andreas Schildbach wrote:\n\u003e Ok, why don't fix this in the spec for now, by defining a fixed expiry\n\u003e time. In the EU, most products are covered by a 2 years warranty, so it\n\u003e seems appropriate to pick 2.5 years (30 months) -- allowing for some\n\u003e time to ship the product back and forth.\nYeah I was thinking something like that on the walk home. But 2 years is\na long time. Do we have enough RAM for that? Plus warranties usually\nresult in the defective goods being replaced rather than a monetary\nrefund, right?\n\nBut adjusting the spec so there's a fixed time limit, and allowing a\nfuture version of the protocol to make it configurable, does indeed feel\nlike the right way to go.\n\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: smime.p7s\nType: application/pkcs7-signature\nSize: 5971 bytes\nDesc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140328/66e42ad9/attachment.p7s\u003e",
"sig": "9763d707308ab158d107d0e99cda5ce0e25b3c256f1a8388e78fdba99cb889286f225c6339c239824ab01938bcb8d1c9bb5a548dbd7fdfdcb210fbc0a08f314f"
}