Event JSON
{
"id": "dc3b8c40f133a056973c8cffd817b6153cad20bd8cbe86389b8a284f41ec9403",
"pubkey": "b653c96197e710cfc7f0bf002af3d12d13c92433d53c3fbab4511da40cff3dbf",
"created_at": 1716753569,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"b653c96197e710cfc7f0bf002af3d12d13c92433d53c3fbab4511da40cff3dbf"
],
[
"e",
"7e6756dcb3c65a9ce488e691841a0ca336dbb9af0fb8f6474a10914a47353664",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"e",
"f54ca567034e72a054fd25743587be4f533d0fffe3dbcca88a50d890677eb11d",
"",
"root"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://dragonscave.space/@jscholes/112509161931807694",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://dragonscave.space/users/jscholes/statuses/112509161931807694",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://dragonscave.space/users/jscholes/statuses/112509161931807694",
"pink.momostr"
]
],
"content": "Some replies have suggested using \"in:library\" as a search qualifier. Unfortunately, no matter what I specify after it, my instance claims there are no matches.\n\nSo, I'm going ahead and using the aforementioned archival tool. I don't like that it's hitting the API to obtain a lot of data that I don't want or need, but I think I've legitimately tried hard enough (short of modifying the software itself) to avoid it.",
"sig": "e35c97ab8811e39a04ab76cfd10662e6b20d76173ecd8aa74d3333600bde9741f29dc7c2352d9e606e431567b711a0ed41427417434b9500db445c11ea46ed06"
}