š
Original date posted:2017-02-28
š Original message:On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 05:47:30PM -0800, Bram Cohen via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes, someone needs to have a lookup table from prevouts to TXO tree
> > positions. But because an insertion-ordered TXO tree does not rebalance,
> > that table can be maintained by wallets or service providers for just their
> > own coins, instead of by every full node and miner individually for
> > everyone's coins.
> >
>
> That falls apart if you want to support proofs of non-spend, which is the
> point of the whole exercise
Can you explain in more detail what you mean there?
--
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170228/403df8fa/attachment.sig>;
Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m2ā¦a2np2
2023-06-07 17:56:50
in reply to nevent1qā¦95gz
Author Public Key
npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2Published at
2023-06-07 17:56:50Event JSON
{
"id": "dc597e0f1465e75fa17fb3d2e9f91417b425b7d962d190e383d31821251a7ad4",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686160610,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ea26a10c9db1f619b5c08bf3401b1d68317c99fb6749769fe543ef9a8f79cb1e",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"c41bf4b7d76eba1af8cf8da242191cfd42bbd1439c865dd5c536e058c2c892c5",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"fb7007c42a06687e3cd3fbbb1a3b17972e2a949ae679445f6b96579114d05cd9"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2017-02-28\nš Original message:On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 05:47:30PM -0800, Bram Cohen via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Pieter Wuille \u003cpieter.wuille at gmail.com\u003e\n\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e Yes, someone needs to have a lookup table from prevouts to TXO tree\n\u003e \u003e positions. But because an insertion-ordered TXO tree does not rebalance,\n\u003e \u003e that table can be maintained by wallets or service providers for just their\n\u003e \u003e own coins, instead of by every full node and miner individually for\n\u003e \u003e everyone's coins.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \n\u003e That falls apart if you want to support proofs of non-spend, which is the\n\u003e point of the whole exercise\n\nCan you explain in more detail what you mean there?\n\n-- \nhttps://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 455 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170228/403df8fa/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "7027bb21d2b9f9c074f2f6ec0ba1c61c816b5473e5e02a2238f57852c59e41f1c359cd7cca44ea96e1fcf30e54fe040dcd0cf4479c8bf634c62a6c677e052bf0"
}