Getting repetitive at this point, but my opinion means little. I am still waiting for the call from the Supreme Court to ask how I interpret the law.
It seems you have a particular insight however into how they will rule, maybe you’re an insider?
I’ll make you a deal: if the Supreme Court rules Trump violated posse I will Nostr admit that you were right.
As everyone knows, nobody is above the law, *and* innocent until proven guilty.
So will you take the other side of the deal? If Trump is not found guilty specifically of violating posse, will you nostr admit you were wrong?
furio
npub1jx…d0mdf
2025-06-14 00:12:04
in reply to nevent1q…tafd
Author Public Key
npub1jxjmyk2zfmfnn5uveg88kvrtcxlkfzcvxj54q8ht795mzypxq7sqtd0mdfPublished at
2025-06-14 00:12:04Event JSON
{
"id": "d28f05452ff2fafda80052596404059a618eaf974dc7066ba2826496859cef67",
"pubkey": "91a5b259424ed339d38cca0e7b306bc1bf648b0c34a9501eebf169b1102607a0",
"created_at": 1749859924,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"2e88555e47af244d3db6dd4d971c56d6980b803c0c0342862a77493ff439f688",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"d01af8295dfdcc12fc91b0bc6918b7f11cd6ca328f70a506d881e838274462e0",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"d30ea98ea65e953f91ab93f6b30ea51eb33c506f87d49f600a139aef00aa9511"
]
],
"content": "Getting repetitive at this point, but my opinion means little. I am still waiting for the call from the Supreme Court to ask how I interpret the law. \n\nIt seems you have a particular insight however into how they will rule, maybe you’re an insider?\n\nI’ll make you a deal: if the Supreme Court rules Trump violated posse I will Nostr admit that you were right.\n\nAs everyone knows, nobody is above the law, *and* innocent until proven guilty.\n\nSo will you take the other side of the deal? If Trump is not found guilty specifically of violating posse, will you nostr admit you were wrong?",
"sig": "cdf6a75f6e984d2e554b8f82dec0eb70065d01c6bf3e25c5a9b90d5214ae8415d133c32acba6cdce4c7dd99aca58716d6ee1106eb222ad8e70bc775a2423cc65"
}