Event JSON
{
"id": "d2db75bf671b3b0ca12c5fa678b71da4df28fe32fda0a9682049264451144ed7",
"pubkey": "790e5e1a77f369f0eae0afb55dd1fae16c51eb87977c87a9b4fa113c6bac5399",
"created_at": 1700183837,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"6fb50f0ba167d7077083e92562d9d925640b4baf48d7649add1c0497a496909c",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"9e5e88ebb0182d8384f2fd3a094f2d7b2cf1d9d2261c7d221f1d87d2b13e785f",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"d79d9e0660750ea9c25dc8bd8cd94b5c3e2c6c5d434e81f96d6ee9a4b3848e0e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://toot.cafe/users/matt/statuses/111423247972707676",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1d76s7zapvltswuyrayjk9kwey4jqkja0frtkfxkarszf0fykjzwq93897u I guess the crux of the disagreement is summed up in this from part 4: \"The “traditional desktop” is dead, and it’s not coming back\" People like the author of the original article might respond that it's only dead because specific project teams decided to kill it, that the decision to kill it didn't have enough benefit to outweigh the cost of change, and therefore, GNOME didn't have to do that.",
"sig": "28cb5870303545fa1238c22f148378da6a5a54552ccf378f13bc73af48fdc14975b960ee628bc42cd55805273fc30b1e36e5fa6fd6019376136c1d9baaa9141b"
}