Jeff Garzik [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2011-09-20 🗒️ Summary of this message: The process of ...
📅 Original date posted:2011-09-20
🗒️ Summary of this message: The process of releasing and maintaining a new version of the Linux kernel can be applied to Bitcoin, including decentralized operation and community decision-making.
📝 Original message:This is the way it works for the kernel, the process on which I've
suggested we follow with bitcoin, to a small extent:
- Version X is released. Linus now begins accepting pull requests
into torvalds/linux.git for X+1 ("merge window opens"). It is
strongly recommended that all pull requests have seen some exposure to
the public via "linux-next", which is a tree-of-trees generated from
pulling the trees of top developers. linux-next is maintained by
another volunteer, Stephen Rothwell.
- After a week, Linus stops taking pull requests from subsystem
maintainers ("merge window closes"). At this point, a 2.5-month
stabilization and bug fix period begins. No new features are merged
into torvalds/linux.git, and developers are expected to focus on bug
fixing. Developers, of course, accept new features and changes into
their own trees and branches. linux-next publishes these, while the
main torvalds/linux.git remains in bug fix mode.
- Three months after version X is released, version X+1 is released
from torvalds/linux.git top-of-tree, and the process begins anew.
- From time to time, _not_ every version, a Linux "enterprise"
distribution like Red Hat Enterprise Linux (plug plug) or Ubuntu LTS,
will maintain a kernel for a long time, for the benefit of their
customers who need stability over new feature. Or, the community
simply decides that a kernel should be maintained for a longer period
of time.
In particular, Greg Kroah-Hartman (gregkh) maintains stable trees for
version X-1 and X-2, where he will accept fixes provided that the fix
(or a variant thereof) has been accepted in upstream.
In that case, an employee or volunteer maintains a stable branch of
the kernel. They "backport" fixes from the main torvalds/linux.git
tree into their own gregkh/stable-2.6.36-linux.git tree.
Thus, we observe a few things that may be applied to bitcoin:
- decentralized operation, where stable branches and bitcoin-next are
not maintained by the core team
- the community decides which versions are important to maintain long term
- the core team may maintain a merge/stabilize/merge/stabilize
workflow, introducing new features without huge negative impact to
existing userbase
--
Jeff Garzik
exMULTI, Inc.
jgarzik at exmulti.com
Published at
2023-06-07 02:27:32Event JSON
{
"id": "d2cb1e67dced9bbe6db0eb099f384c679e69d7ec810553c9cbeb6b9948f2e973",
"pubkey": "b25e10e25d470d9b215521b50da0dfe7a209bec7fedeb53860c3e180ffdc8c11",
"created_at": 1686104852,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"0ae916b64652df113a104fccbfbc28fa76834bc49558c45ca1a489a5c0f8c04c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"32b352104c91cd25f888d86b9eca40bb0058725a57268d2e089a5fc5f83ed56a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"7b17a27b7a85e67ba7923c452fbb08ed536244f667a20168dfc3172a83c992df"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2011-09-20\n🗒️ Summary of this message: The process of releasing and maintaining a new version of the Linux kernel can be applied to Bitcoin, including decentralized operation and community decision-making.\n📝 Original message:This is the way it works for the kernel, the process on which I've\nsuggested we follow with bitcoin, to a small extent:\n\n- Version X is released. Linus now begins accepting pull requests\ninto torvalds/linux.git for X+1 (\"merge window opens\"). It is\nstrongly recommended that all pull requests have seen some exposure to\nthe public via \"linux-next\", which is a tree-of-trees generated from\npulling the trees of top developers. linux-next is maintained by\nanother volunteer, Stephen Rothwell.\n\n- After a week, Linus stops taking pull requests from subsystem\nmaintainers (\"merge window closes\"). At this point, a 2.5-month\nstabilization and bug fix period begins. No new features are merged\ninto torvalds/linux.git, and developers are expected to focus on bug\nfixing. Developers, of course, accept new features and changes into\ntheir own trees and branches. linux-next publishes these, while the\nmain torvalds/linux.git remains in bug fix mode.\n\n- Three months after version X is released, version X+1 is released\nfrom torvalds/linux.git top-of-tree, and the process begins anew.\n\n- From time to time, _not_ every version, a Linux \"enterprise\"\ndistribution like Red Hat Enterprise Linux (plug plug) or Ubuntu LTS,\nwill maintain a kernel for a long time, for the benefit of their\ncustomers who need stability over new feature. Or, the community\nsimply decides that a kernel should be maintained for a longer period\nof time.\n\nIn particular, Greg Kroah-Hartman (gregkh) maintains stable trees for\nversion X-1 and X-2, where he will accept fixes provided that the fix\n(or a variant thereof) has been accepted in upstream.\n\nIn that case, an employee or volunteer maintains a stable branch of\nthe kernel. They \"backport\" fixes from the main torvalds/linux.git\ntree into their own gregkh/stable-2.6.36-linux.git tree.\n\nThus, we observe a few things that may be applied to bitcoin:\n\n- decentralized operation, where stable branches and bitcoin-next are\nnot maintained by the core team\n- the community decides which versions are important to maintain long term\n- the core team may maintain a merge/stabilize/merge/stabilize\nworkflow, introducing new features without huge negative impact to\nexisting userbase\n\n-- \nJeff Garzik\nexMULTI, Inc.\njgarzik at exmulti.com",
"sig": "a961505583a209e9f05eca61708cf5017f7e3189aaae0906d76d0e096897daf1886c2ffd9cefe49cf3945d396dc7b22d57d7db9a3bd865cb75fe97ed94036f38"
}