馃搮 Original date posted:2015-09-21
馃摑 Original message:Jorge Tim贸n <jtimon at jtimon.cc> writes:
> On Sep 20, 2015 10:58 PM, "Rusty Russell" <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
>>
>> Jorge Tim贸n <jtimon at jtimon.cc> writes:
>> > I disagree with the importance of this concern and old soft/hardforks
> will
>> > replace this activation mechanism with height, so that's an argument in
>> > favor of using the height from the start. This is "being discussed" in a
>> > thread branched from bip99's discussion.
>>
>> Thanks, I'll have to dig through bitcoin-dev and find it.
>
> The initial thread is linked to from the BIP document (which is in the
> bitcoin/bips PR).
Thanks, read and digested.
The good news is that timeout via GetMedianTimePast() doesn't have any
effect on "should I accept this to mempool", and seems pretty
uncontroversial. Activation is by block number once vote hits 95%, so
that too is fairly simple to implement.
Cheers,
Rusty.
Rusty Russell [ARCHIVE] /
npub1zw鈥khpx
2023-06-07 17:40:09
in reply to nevent1q鈥7xr
Author Public Key
npub1zw7cc8z78v6s3grujfvcv3ckpvg6kr0w7nz9yzvwyglyg0qu5sjsqhkhpxPublished at
2023-06-07 17:40:09Event JSON
{
"id": "d2dcd6e3bff592b5f6b3eb21bfd0d24e4eec62b134a33605e56e55e257b7c7e0",
"pubkey": "13bd8c1c5e3b3508a07c92598647160b11ab0deef4c452098e223e443c1ca425",
"created_at": 1686159609,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"97970fd647e1ad99b763fefc14ff6c3da92992c59a8d85f2e5fe9ba87f5c9fb9",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"f13c5a8121f75b2e46cd40e7dfc1dd32c43688f3f22810a5c91cbd7b6d2f1c32",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84"
]
],
"content": "馃搮 Original date posted:2015-09-21\n馃摑 Original message:Jorge Tim贸n \u003cjtimon at jtimon.cc\u003e writes:\n\u003e On Sep 20, 2015 10:58 PM, \"Rusty Russell\" \u003crusty at rustcorp.com.au\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Jorge Tim贸n \u003cjtimon at jtimon.cc\u003e writes:\n\u003e\u003e \u003e I disagree with the importance of this concern and old soft/hardforks\n\u003e will\n\u003e\u003e \u003e replace this activation mechanism with height, so that's an argument in\n\u003e\u003e \u003e favor of using the height from the start. This is \"being discussed\" in a\n\u003e\u003e \u003e thread branched from bip99's discussion.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Thanks, I'll have to dig through bitcoin-dev and find it.\n\u003e\n\u003e The initial thread is linked to from the BIP document (which is in the\n\u003e bitcoin/bips PR).\n\nThanks, read and digested.\n\nThe good news is that timeout via GetMedianTimePast() doesn't have any\neffect on \"should I accept this to mempool\", and seems pretty\nuncontroversial. Activation is by block number once vote hits 95%, so\nthat too is fairly simple to implement.\n\nCheers,\nRusty.",
"sig": "7479a729a319ebea2d649d7b013194d5a3fd2aeece1b2886e52cb8c17237f07cf318bc55aadd88c9514d0c9c6480f5f0ad62a365f56be0da0f9562ac206d42d8"
}