đź“… Original date posted:2023-04-11
🗒️ Summary of this message: Murch proposes a BIP to establish a shared vocabulary for various components and aspects of transactions to avoid confusion. Concept ACK received.
đź“ť Original message:On Wed Apr 5, 2023 at 8:54 PM CEST, Murch via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Over the years, I have participated in a few conversations about various
> aspects of transactions. Often a chunk of the conversation is spent on
> establishing a shared vocabulary. There are many competing terms—e.g. I
> can think of at least three additional terms that refer to `scriptPubKey`.
>
> I’ve drafted an informational BIP that proposes terminology for various
> components and aspects of transactions. As some established terms are
> already contradictory, the proposal does not aim for a perfectly
> consistent selection of terms, but rather just to establish a shared
> vocabulary to avoid confusion.
>
> Draft: https://github.com/Xekyo/bips/pull/1
>
> Please let me know whether you’d be interested in the creation of such a
> BIP.
Make a lot of sense to me, just recently I found that
I was using a complete different word to refering to `scriptPubKey`
that only me was using :)
So, concept ACK.
Thanks!
Vincent.
Vincenzo Palazzo [ARCHIVE] /
npub1ag…avd3v
2023-06-07 23:20:22
in reply to nevent1q…fuk2
Author Public Key
npub1ag2fg2g28hkp9937ptppmdtm38cl37zmr7w7229g7m75wmgyv73s9avd3vPublished at
2023-06-07 23:20:22Event JSON
{
"id": "d2d03809c3ee8aa10f3efb963b7d11fec16e4483ff6cffc52c22e2f7fa8913fb",
"pubkey": "ea1494290a3dec12963e0ac21db57b89f1f8f85b1f9de528a8f6fd476d0467a3",
"created_at": 1686180022,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"1c56af94af447620aa769e095dd768c9e5b2893c060193eb9c401bd25885bded",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"b00180f3969a2b4a2730c4cc5990f0a4ef226d1ffc937c5fb2d7f8181e89d503",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"0c8af5293ea8c40f3686f22669674e0c116a8e92467163929d736aa891b7ece2"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2023-04-11\n🗒️ Summary of this message: Murch proposes a BIP to establish a shared vocabulary for various components and aspects of transactions to avoid confusion. Concept ACK received.\n📝 Original message:On Wed Apr 5, 2023 at 8:54 PM CEST, Murch via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e Hey everyone,\n\u003e\n\u003e Over the years, I have participated in a few conversations about various \n\u003e aspects of transactions. Often a chunk of the conversation is spent on \n\u003e establishing a shared vocabulary. There are many competing terms—e.g. I \n\u003e can think of at least three additional terms that refer to `scriptPubKey`.\n\u003e\n\u003e I’ve drafted an informational BIP that proposes terminology for various \n\u003e components and aspects of transactions. As some established terms are \n\u003e already contradictory, the proposal does not aim for a perfectly \n\u003e consistent selection of terms, but rather just to establish a shared \n\u003e vocabulary to avoid confusion.\n\u003e\n\u003e Draft: https://github.com/Xekyo/bips/pull/1\n\u003e\n\u003e Please let me know whether you’d be interested in the creation of such a \n\u003e BIP.\n\nMake a lot of sense to me, just recently I found that \nI was using a complete different word to refering to `scriptPubKey` \nthat only me was using :)\n\nSo, concept ACK.\n\nThanks!\n\nVincent.",
"sig": "b160c5381a15c85995319bdbeec7a9fc54fc6a8dcfb51a50ac0e56d3b1c9756ea79ce6075e5fec4148ad9e87694454253bac74af610e7263297a20cb45c5cefd"
}