Thinking about multisigs and social recovery wallets.
Is it possible to have a more complex multisig where m of (n-1) can access the funds (I.e. in case the owner loses their key), but the nth key belongs to the owner (the master key) and can access the funds without anyone's permission?
Is it possible to generalise that further and assign weights to keys? I.e. the master key would have full weight to reproduce the above behaviour and other keys would have lower weights depending on how much the owner trusts the keyholder.
npub1f3…063xj
2023-03-07 11:41:47
Author Public Key
npub1f3jgux2xv6qcz579telhz9smklkthmzs26kygxzs84alalh2lfeqg063xjPublished at
2023-03-07 11:41:47Event JSON
{
"id": "d2d6bfa13a1855e38acc380253ea4a16e551eb06fc49239fc22448a283f5a685",
"pubkey": "4c648e194666818153c55e7f71161bb7ecbbec5056ac4418503d7bfefeeafa72",
"created_at": 1678189307,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "Thinking about multisigs and social recovery wallets.\n\nIs it possible to have a more complex multisig where m of (n-1) can access the funds (I.e. in case the owner loses their key), but the nth key belongs to the owner (the master key) and can access the funds without anyone's permission?\n\nIs it possible to generalise that further and assign weights to keys? I.e. the master key would have full weight to reproduce the above behaviour and other keys would have lower weights depending on how much the owner trusts the keyholder.",
"sig": "24da3c9b6210a33d2d147e644853b40cac6f02d6b7565e5ead1fcefcd2a042b9045dd94b3022cd74c0fcc492ff0a7b4baa63a7d845826809c609c7ec80bcdee6"
}