📅 Original date posted:2012-01-30
📝 Original message:On Monday, January 30, 2012 1:07:16 PM thomasV1 at gmx.de wrote:
> I too support BIP21 over BIP20.
BIP 21 is not forwards-compatible, and is intentionally designed to be biased
toward decimal. BIP 20 is neutrally biased, forward-compatible, and has been
implemented for over a year now. If BIP 20 is to be Superceded, a proposal
should improve on it, not make it worse with bigotry and short-sightedness.
Luke-Jr [ARCHIVE] /
npub1dt…u7wrs
2023-06-07 02:59:59
in reply to nevent1q…px8j
Author Public Key
npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrsSeen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 02:59:59Event JSON
{
"id": "d3ee57ad7abb60700dfb5961e9a99e6618518686c791fdadf2ce656b47edfa3d",
"pubkey": "6ac6a519b554d8ff726a301e3daec0b489f443793778feccc6ea7a536f7354f1",
"created_at": 1686106799,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"3e5956a8acf8033ec81960cff0126fd9c6cb72d9935ba44f4558ea419f8c85b8",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"efec6b7fb650e56cf5cd576f1fd0929a97cad65f0859247f24351136377baa21",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5a3ff7d6936729d592214577710670f538ac832ae11dad508c85b1ac8f8b0af1"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2012-01-30\n📝 Original message:On Monday, January 30, 2012 1:07:16 PM thomasV1 at gmx.de wrote:\n\u003e I too support BIP21 over BIP20.\n\nBIP 21 is not forwards-compatible, and is intentionally designed to be biased \ntoward decimal. BIP 20 is neutrally biased, forward-compatible, and has been \nimplemented for over a year now. If BIP 20 is to be Superceded, a proposal \nshould improve on it, not make it worse with bigotry and short-sightedness.",
"sig": "541a30ed39922206ddd6ca499c8cfc06c1e5c5d6d477b48a6f3db807bc8943dec8cccc441c628593c70d6641009c54171896b3fb5b25d5719513791fe655bd73"
}