Dasus on Nostr: Oh you're laughing at it because he's so familiar to you because it's the most ...

Oh you're laughing at it because he's so familiar to you because it's the most "hardcore" philosophy you've ever engaged with? Yeah, I assumed as much.

That's why I assumed you wouldn't read "Leviathan" and from all your writing it's clear you never have previously. Or even listened to a summary. Perhaps had those playing in the background, *pretending* like you've been listening to them.

The way you can't distinguish a thought from the philosopher who brought it up shows that you larp as being read instead of being read.

>I don’t need Alain de Buttman’s watered down baby philosophy for online babies, please and thank you.

Oh you most certainly do. It would definitely improve your skill on larping as a philosopher if you had the ability to pay any attention.

>I’ve read thousands of pages of philosophy.

Thanks. That got rid of some phlegm. **THOUSANDS** of pages you say. Wow. That must be like... **at least** a half a dozen books. :D

We'll continue the conversation when you understand how asinine your earlier garbage is. If you weren't an egoistical teenager who's all about what other's perceive for them to have read and done and actually put import on *understanding* the things people say to you, you would at least skim what the Leviathan is about so you'd know what point I was making. But the fact you're incapable of even understanding that means that I'm simply not interested in anything you have to say as you have zero intellectual curiosity. That sort of youthful egoism is fine, as long as it's driven by actual intellect.

Yours isn't.

Your previous comment. It looks a bit like how ridiculous it looks to you to now look illustrations of what people in the late 19th century thought the 21st century would look like. Firemen with flappy wings and whatnot. It's utterly ridiculous because you know that would be the absolute worst way to go about flying. Either the wings would have to be absolutely massive or go really fast and still they'd be much worse than most other options we have for personal flying we can already achieve, like the jetpacks. The reason I'm saying this is **that** is what it looks like to me when reading your "arguments". I can see how someone ignorant of political theory might formulate a naive theory like that, but the theory itself is utterly ridiculous and wouldn't work because of facts you do not seem to know.

If you have even the tiniest bit of intellectual curiosity, you'll look up what the Leviathan is about (while remembering to distinguish between an author and an idea) and then you'll see why your earlier assertions are laughably naive.