📅 Original date posted:2018-08-05
📝 Original message:Hi everyone,
My name's Lautaro and I'm currently acting as Tech Lead of Po.et
<https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/OP_RETURN#OP_RETURN_prefixes>;. At Po.et we use
colored coins
<https://github.com/poetapp/node/blob/3c905bc5dbd3722ad39ac68041d9f2a099e5e84c/src/BlockchainWriter/ClaimController.ts#L101-L110>;
to
store data on the Bitcoin blockchain with prefix "POET".
I've read in an old version of the OP_RETURN entry of the bitcoin wiki
<https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=OP_RETURN&oldid=62560>; that *protocols
wishing to claim OP_RETURN prefixes should use the standard Bitcoin
Improvement Proposals process*.
That entry seems to have changed recently
<https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/OP_RETURN#OP_RETURN_prefixes>;, no longer
stating that we should follow the BIP process, and I haven't been able to
find any existing BIP claiming an OP_RETURN prexif, but for the sake of
thoroughness I'd like to ask for your help or confirmation here.
Should we actually be using the BIP process to claim a prefix?
Thanks in advance,
Lautaro
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180805/c445b874/attachment.html>;
Lautaro Dragan [ARCHIVE] /
npub19q…xhy9k
2023-06-07 18:13:58
in reply to nevent1q…v4p7
Author Public Key
npub19qm5p22ftgqclvmh7dzfe5gvxrrrd3d2a2zulp8xfj57c4ehztysyxhy9kPublished at
2023-06-07 18:13:58Event JSON
{
"id": "da4aed95392702d8f48bc4d081d1d0c97dc4ac7131ec0c79f89c8421cc964f98",
"pubkey": "283740a9495a018fb377f3449cd10c30c636c5aaea85cf84e64ca9ec573712c9",
"created_at": 1686161638,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"eccbd39bd966baef56b5939c955d566f9fe6d2296c2c463ce1c7b09a9df0388b",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a23dbf6c6cc83e14cc3df4e56cc71845f611908084cfe620e83e40c06ccdd3d0"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2018-08-05\n📝 Original message:Hi everyone,\n\nMy name's Lautaro and I'm currently acting as Tech Lead of Po.et\n\u003chttps://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/OP_RETURN#OP_RETURN_prefixes\u003e. At Po.et we use\ncolored coins\n\u003chttps://github.com/poetapp/node/blob/3c905bc5dbd3722ad39ac68041d9f2a099e5e84c/src/BlockchainWriter/ClaimController.ts#L101-L110\u003e\nto\nstore data on the Bitcoin blockchain with prefix \"POET\".\n\nI've read in an old version of the OP_RETURN entry of the bitcoin wiki\n\u003chttps://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=OP_RETURN\u0026oldid=62560\u003e that *protocols\nwishing to claim OP_RETURN prefixes should use the standard Bitcoin\nImprovement Proposals process*.\n\nThat entry seems to have changed recently\n\u003chttps://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/OP_RETURN#OP_RETURN_prefixes\u003e, no longer\nstating that we should follow the BIP process, and I haven't been able to\nfind any existing BIP claiming an OP_RETURN prexif, but for the sake of\nthoroughness I'd like to ask for your help or confirmation here.\n\nShould we actually be using the BIP process to claim a prefix?\n\nThanks in advance,\n\nLautaro\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180805/c445b874/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "6d743137e4ca503185a6b3abdf343ae10d15cf7afc6b3b323f2a07b81ba1820d38bcd9398bf22c9c42fbb5167a996a4afb21e50829be3c163856659474fa95e8"
}