š
Original date posted:2017-01-12
š Original message:On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 09:13:23AM -0500, Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> BIP125 is the standard way to signal:
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0125.mediawiki
>
> Should explain everything you need.
Additionally some miners mine full replace-by-fee, which has no limitations on
nSequence. My implementation (for v0.13.2) is here:
https://github.com/petertodd/bitcoin/tree/replace-by-fee-v0.13.2
and is identical to Bitcoin Core modulo the nSequence stuff being removed, and
a special service bit added to allow full-rbf nodes to preferentially peer with
each other to make sure replacement transactions get propagated.
In practice full-RBF works fairly well, so while it's even faster to use the
nSequence signalling specified in BIP-125, doing so is not mandatory so long as
you can et your replacement transaction to a full-RBF node.
--
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170112/3af4525d/attachment.sig>;
Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m2ā¦a2np2
2023-06-07 17:55:31
in reply to nevent1qā¦c2ja
Author Public Key
npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2Published at
2023-06-07 17:55:31Event JSON
{
"id": "da689aac978a241b2596beac4b12b42696eb29c750795eacae21850d78afe4f8",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686160531,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"9500affc1d70d507762ec90535492732302f598e9dd922cc4d8e989696627145",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"e9fb7882a6d14c83c1160a70700bc2a59913effc6884120c4275ceb4688190c2",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"937f10fc4f78d8676348562d9d886843fbb351d99d6c96423fe9970819962e19"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2017-01-12\nš Original message:On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 09:13:23AM -0500, Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e BIP125 is the standard way to signal:\n\u003e https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0125.mediawiki\n\u003e \n\u003e Should explain everything you need.\n\nAdditionally some miners mine full replace-by-fee, which has no limitations on\nnSequence. My implementation (for v0.13.2) is here:\n\n https://github.com/petertodd/bitcoin/tree/replace-by-fee-v0.13.2\n\nand is identical to Bitcoin Core modulo the nSequence stuff being removed, and\na special service bit added to allow full-rbf nodes to preferentially peer with\neach other to make sure replacement transactions get propagated.\n\nIn practice full-RBF works fairly well, so while it's even faster to use the\nnSequence signalling specified in BIP-125, doing so is not mandatory so long as\nyou can et your replacement transaction to a full-RBF node.\n\n-- \nhttps://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 455 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170112/3af4525d/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "3251607001b21f7c61afca5e4da3f0b71ace0b664d58c96cd22bdba9ea06b50572739b5822db5806d504e11d1d9910d643a59f662fa1664bca3b605e671ced36"
}