no, because it's very unclear and to me it just sounds like you are complaining about signers being burdensome on users, and outside of your control as client dev
i think i made the point pretty clearly that you DON'T have to kow-tow to the idiotic consensus that you "must use detached signers" for it to be a secure app, the only real concern is that users may become complacent about rogue apps, but equally they could become complacent about signers if more of them existed, so really the problem is moot, eggs, basket, same same
imagine how it is as a relay dev when for 6 months of the time i was in development with #realy, i couldn't find a client that actually let me point at my relay and ensure it was even working??? it just seems like a petty complaint to talk about UX of detached signers when you do have the option of controlling that yourself as client dev, not only that, you could bundle your own signer, there is already several forks of nos2x and you could just make your own that has sane policies built into it that fit your needs
what is it that i'm missing here?
mleku
npub1fj…mleku
2025-05-20 15:59:01
in reply to nevent1q…u4dm
Author Public Key
npub1fjqqy4a93z5zsjwsfxqhc2764kvykfdyttvldkkkdera8dr78vhsmmlekuPublished at
2025-05-20 15:59:01Event JSON
{
"id": "da9aed4d46aca60041c1cad63fd8c9f46f87936e964522b98242860b5faa066a",
"pubkey": "4c800257a588a82849d049817c2bdaad984b25a45ad9f6dad66e47d3b47e3b2f",
"created_at": 1747756741,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"realy"
],
[
"e",
"41db26ef381e789bc0c7dc809295166205506a173a5f121ce641fb649b2e6a7c",
"wss://relay.damus.io/",
"root",
"266815e0c9210dfa324c6cba3573b14bee49da4209a9456f9484e5106cd408a5"
],
[
"e",
"15cc2e30d3b07f74a956647ce4e600b3e6878adc1b9525d68cce7fd4c2fb93b9",
"wss://nos.lol/",
"reply",
"8125b911ed0e94dbe3008a0be48cfe5cd0c0b05923cfff917ae7e87da8400883"
],
[
"p",
"266815e0c9210dfa324c6cba3573b14bee49da4209a9456f9484e5106cd408a5"
],
[
"p",
"8125b911ed0e94dbe3008a0be48cfe5cd0c0b05923cfff917ae7e87da8400883"
]
],
"content": "no, because it's very unclear and to me it just sounds like you are complaining about signers being burdensome on users, and outside of your control as client dev\n\ni think i made the point pretty clearly that you DON'T have to kow-tow to the idiotic consensus that you \"must use detached signers\" for it to be a secure app, the only real concern is that users may become complacent about rogue apps, but equally they could become complacent about signers if more of them existed, so really the problem is moot, eggs, basket, same same\n\nimagine how it is as a relay dev when for 6 months of the time i was in development with #realy, i couldn't find a client that actually let me point at my relay and ensure it was even working??? it just seems like a petty complaint to talk about UX of detached signers when you do have the option of controlling that yourself as client dev, not only that, you could bundle your own signer, there is already several forks of nos2x and you could just make your own that has sane policies built into it that fit your needs\n\nwhat is it that i'm missing here?",
"sig": "0952000ce561084407bae4492b003c216f87f0bdc919d759a8d4531a96fe8a667a00049e7c51eb02be846b78e9d4b6be67fa0a8de78a9f477ad747873c721be1"
}