📅 Original date posted:2015-02-03
📝 Original message:> Regardless, I think a standard for passing partially signed transactions around might make sense (maybe a future extension to BIP70), with attention to both PC <-> small hardware devices and pushing stuff around on the Internet. It would be great if users had a choice of hardware signing devices, local software and third-party cosigning services that would all interoperate out of the box to enable easy multisig security, which in the BTC world subsumes the goals of 2FA.
I think a standard for passing partially signed transactions is a great idea as well. This would support interoperability of wallets/clients and third-party services (if users choose to use them).
Brian Erdelyi
Brian Erdelyi [ARCHIVE] /
npub1ta…j25sq
2023-06-07 15:29:32
in reply to nevent1q…44jz
Author Public Key
npub1tatcq4sq4leywpxwgqd90eut5933h62lrrnzu28mx95w80s75hzspj25sqSeen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 15:29:32Event JSON
{
"id": "da833717c7b57948059df1f3d267d5e8c3edf7bd0a571b4cb1d288112e9719e1",
"pubkey": "5f57805600aff24704ce401a57e78ba1631be95f18e62e28fb3168e3be1ea5c5",
"created_at": 1686151772,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"4a6f0574e60dd94083ee2c44a33058d163eecce8fa7924cda65c1a095dfabb8a",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"e0fb443db99925845b8b259a8115136b3e38fb6512a68da34b86f1d3dc04e68c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"61b2c6faff20bdd598ddd3bca64f89f50266e7704125f7e33253437f352aae41"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-02-03\n📝 Original message:\u003e Regardless, I think a standard for passing partially signed transactions around might make sense (maybe a future extension to BIP70), with attention to both PC \u003c-\u003e small hardware devices and pushing stuff around on the Internet. It would be great if users had a choice of hardware signing devices, local software and third-party cosigning services that would all interoperate out of the box to enable easy multisig security, which in the BTC world subsumes the goals of 2FA.\n\nI think a standard for passing partially signed transactions is a great idea as well. This would support interoperability of wallets/clients and third-party services (if users choose to use them).\n\nBrian Erdelyi",
"sig": "03d252e5003c4d277b91322ae0d6e9771ff86420bcd95d3fae4d27ceed1692fa2b173b3dcb4b1d071a0f01f73ee90a1214f74576b9d7e708ef0f01644718344b"
}