📅 Original date posted:2012-02-29
📝 Original message:I support BIP 30.
I gave it a thought. The other ways of resolving this issue, all have various niggles. This is the best way.
________________________________
From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille at gmail.com>
To: Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn <zooko at zooko.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 4:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Duplicate transactions vulnerability
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 06:41:31PM -0700, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
> Could you spell out the attack explicitly? Presumably there aren't a
> lot of people with the "malice energy" to perform the attack but not
> to figure it out for themselves. I, however, have the "niceness
> energy" to think about it for a few minutes but not to figure it out
> for myself. If in your opinion it is realistically dangerous to post
> it publicly, would you be so kind as to include me in the private
> sharing of the explanation?
It's not exactly a secret anymore, as the patch also references it.
Russell O'Connor described the attack on his blog:
http://r6.ca/blog/20120206T005236Z.html
--
Pieter
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20120229/87a7dc28/attachment.html>;
Amir Taaki [ARCHIVE] /
npub1ep…m3rel
2023-06-07 03:09:55
in reply to nevent1q…zdkd
Author Public Key
npub1ep4j5tjp6cd2774hrx96vh845dwqzhe3z7n3a2a9uxdm2dajqpgscm3relSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 03:09:55Event JSON
{
"id": "d56dbe4eefa29492121fdd6c69f777ff20940c284522f6958267b551210fef4c",
"pubkey": "c86b2a2e41d61aaf7ab7198ba65cf5a35c015f3117a71eaba5e19bb537b20051",
"created_at": 1686107395,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"431de1b2053f2297a5c4d8abb946e01d3f305001a64415bafb02369c2320d799",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"ff235e4a7bce816769c4b90f588087ccead8ec35f4b9cf41fef13891a805160e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5cb21bf5d7f25a9d46879713cbd32433bbc10e40ef813a3c28fe7355f49854d6"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2012-02-29\n📝 Original message:I support BIP 30.\n\nI gave it a thought. The other ways of resolving this issue, all have various niggles. This is the best way.\n\n\n________________________________\n From: Pieter Wuille \u003cpieter.wuille at gmail.com\u003e\nTo: Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn \u003czooko at zooko.com\u003e \nCc: Bitcoin Dev \u003cbitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\u003e \nSent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 4:47 PM\nSubject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Duplicate transactions vulnerability\n \nOn Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 06:41:31PM -0700, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:\n\u003e Could you spell out the attack explicitly? Presumably there aren't a\n\u003e lot of people with the \"malice energy\" to perform the attack but not\n\u003e to figure it out for themselves. I, however, have the \"niceness\n\u003e energy\" to think about it for a few minutes but not to figure it out\n\u003e for myself. If in your opinion it is realistically dangerous to post\n\u003e it publicly, would you be so kind as to include me in the private\n\u003e sharing of the explanation?\n\nIt's not exactly a secret anymore, as the patch also references it.\nRussell O'Connor described the attack on his blog:\nhttp://r6.ca/blog/20120206T005236Z.html\n\n-- \nPieter\n\n------------------------------------------------------------------------------\nVirtualization \u0026 Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning\nCloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing \nalso focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.\nhttp://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/\n_______________________________________________\nBitcoin-development mailing list\nBitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\nhttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20120229/87a7dc28/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "73ee808ffcdd6a3befea18100bbb1832fba0f2b61b0d0708309d33a1609c989f7a5cb7ab91aa8161d68df44be55f1ac667e190239acd857af1d0df73f0c25787"
}