📅 Original date posted:2023-03-02
🗒️ Summary of this message: A developer plans to use service bit 24 to signal Utreexo-capable nodes on testnet and signet, with plans to release binaries in the coming months.
📝 Original message:This sounds like something that should be written up as a BIP and use a
normal service bit assignment...?
Luke
On 3/2/23 01:55, kcalvinalvin via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Wanted to tell the mailing list that I'll be using service bit 24 (1
> << 24) to signal that nodes are Utreexo capable nodes on testnet and
> signet as requested by the comment in protocol.h in
> bitcoind (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/74981aa02d2b14ad1c0b82d1eb09cf3169eaa8ae/src/protocol.h#L295-L301).
> There are plans to release binaries for the utreexo node
> (github.com/utreexo/utreexod) in the next few months so that power
> users can try it out. I have no plans to release binaries for mainnet
> yet.
>
> Do let me know if someone else is using the same bit to signal for
> something else and we can coordinate accordingly.
>
> Best,
> Calvin
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
Luke Dashjr [ARCHIVE] /
npub1tf…rfq0n
2023-06-07 23:20:16
in reply to nevent1q…q30w
Author Public Key
npub1tfk373zg9dnmtvxnpnq7s2dkdgj37rwfj3yrwld7830qltmv8qps8rfq0nPublished at
2023-06-07 23:20:16Event JSON
{
"id": "d55fb1b3b499138f9a95cde697346b195a051585dcd1ee3f65e4814de7f257dc",
"pubkey": "5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803",
"created_at": 1686180016,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"995aa32f38609282619e51d203b2d277e47693aa64c648b5f59d95c60fce5c6c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"66a72aa27cd964e6d412c7e3dfe1a37024e9e0f2830ea83da62e376723c27478",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"e953bc12d9f86a1536a16ff0fb9950a8d026ae6a373cf2772da14b9dc45566be"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2023-03-02\n🗒️ Summary of this message: A developer plans to use service bit 24 to signal Utreexo-capable nodes on testnet and signet, with plans to release binaries in the coming months.\n📝 Original message:This sounds like something that should be written up as a BIP and use a \nnormal service bit assignment...?\n\nLuke\n\n\nOn 3/2/23 01:55, kcalvinalvin via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e Hello all,\n\u003e\n\u003e Wanted to tell the mailing list that I'll be using service bit 24 (1 \n\u003e \u003c\u003c 24) to signal that nodes are Utreexo capable nodes on testnet and \n\u003e signet as requested by the comment in protocol.h in \n\u003e bitcoind (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/74981aa02d2b14ad1c0b82d1eb09cf3169eaa8ae/src/protocol.h#L295-L301). \n\u003e There are plans to release binaries for the utreexo node \n\u003e (github.com/utreexo/utreexod) in the next few months so that power \n\u003e users can try it out. I have no plans to release binaries for mainnet \n\u003e yet.\n\u003e\n\u003e Do let me know if someone else is using the same bit to signal for \n\u003e something else and we can coordinate accordingly.\n\u003e\n\u003e Best,\n\u003e Calvin\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev",
"sig": "525d4b378f609a86772c6bdc0aa5c2dd7eb2e71fb5d93658f230c030f49773b49fd4329458eab0a4f910aee5e95f22acf954295f12b53b612eac37ea3188dd89"
}