Matthew Mitchell [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2013-09-10 📝 Original message:Well let's hope something ...
📅 Original date posted:2013-09-10
📝 Original message:Well let's hope something like "murder black people", "stupid asian person" or "whip african slave" doesn't come up. :-) Maybe it would have been better without the aggressive words?
Matthew
On 10 Sep 2013, at 21:50, slush <slush at centrum.cz> wrote:
> In many iterations of editing the wordlist we made our best to pick
> words which are easy to remember, still "neutral". Unfortunately it's
> almost impossible to exclude some words which may together create
> negative co-notations.
>
> Thankfully we removed all racist and religious words so I believe all
> three authors mentioned in the BIP are safe against fundamentalist
> bitcoin users :-).
>
> slush
>
> On 9/10/13, Matthew Mitchell <matthewmitchell at godofgod.co.uk> wrote:
>> I like this, though maybe sometimes you'll get rude word combinations come
>> out.
>>
>> Matthew
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130910/c70bd147/attachment.sig>
Published at
2023-06-07 15:06:44Event JSON
{
"id": "d79056513113db1f315f902c28864459f5b24c26e4273df4f1c18d6d9d215abc",
"pubkey": "3f2774563d1c12c3eaa3bee0d1a9ca3ff60c63547aa831b01c069d0f8d37e8c7",
"created_at": 1686150404,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f96c28c85c0847f8eaf72aae35a427f25abb36801f6e4426cdbfa42216824413",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"8931e1394e5ebc63eff0dab84bcf97beda40ee9a6c7fbfc0404e05b0cbd9c8f4",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"eb7ca795057ca7cabde6f541c741e661d013414934e5934c2e04c6677625c99a"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-09-10\n📝 Original message:Well let's hope something like \"murder black people\", \"stupid asian person\" or \"whip african slave\" doesn't come up. :-) Maybe it would have been better without the aggressive words?\n\nMatthew\n\nOn 10 Sep 2013, at 21:50, slush \u003cslush at centrum.cz\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e In many iterations of editing the wordlist we made our best to pick\n\u003e words which are easy to remember, still \"neutral\". Unfortunately it's\n\u003e almost impossible to exclude some words which may together create\n\u003e negative co-notations.\n\u003e \n\u003e Thankfully we removed all racist and religious words so I believe all\n\u003e three authors mentioned in the BIP are safe against fundamentalist\n\u003e bitcoin users :-).\n\u003e \n\u003e slush\n\u003e \n\u003e On 9/10/13, Matthew Mitchell \u003cmatthewmitchell at godofgod.co.uk\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e I like this, though maybe sometimes you'll get rude word combinations come\n\u003e\u003e out.\n\u003e\u003e \n\u003e\u003e Matthew\n\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 496 bytes\nDesc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130910/c70bd147/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "7f88bc241108cb23e934b55d60ca2a02bde76cec6f95b7683ee10d362013438e2370d339573ecf7ee95ae842162cc60364ce6554c35ef41e525ae269dd9257c4"
}